By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The president expressed disbelief over ABC’s decision to reinstate Jimmy Kimmel’s show, alleging the network was previously informed of its cancellation. He criticized Kimmel’s performance and perceived bias, suggesting the show is a Democratic Party mouthpiece, potentially violating campaign finance laws. The president hinted at legal action, referencing a prior settlement with ABC and indicating potential financial gain. Despite Kimmel’s censorship, FCC officials maintain the decision was made independently by private entities, disregarding previous pressure applied to the broadcasting companies.
Read the original article here
Trump Threatens Jimmy Kimmel—Again—and Destroys MAGA’s Entire Defense: Let’s be clear, this isn’t just another spat; it’s a declaration. Trump is essentially admitting he used the power of the Federal government to target ABC and, by extension, Jimmy Kimmel. The reason? He believes their content leans too far to the left. He’s not hiding it; in fact, he’s doubling down and hinting he’ll do it again. This isn’t a misinterpretation; it’s a direct statement of intent. The former president is explicitly linking his actions to the perceived political leanings of the network, suggesting an orchestrated attack aimed at silencing perceived critics.
This isn’t about Charlie Kirk or any specific comment. This is about Trump’s personal vendetta against anyone who dares to challenge him. He’s making it crystal clear: criticism is met with retribution. This is where the entire premise of MAGA crumbles. Their core defense, whatever it might have been, becomes irrelevant. Because Trump’s words admit to using the power of his office as a weapon. It’s hard to defend a claim when the instigator just openly confesses to the deed.
The disturbing part is the blatant nature of it all. He’s not even attempting to be subtle anymore. It’s an open acknowledgement of potential political coercion. One would think, and it’s hard not to think, this borders on extortion. He’s explicitly mentioning “testing” ABC, and referencing past financial settlements. It feels less like politics and more like a shakedown. Where is the line drawn?
The very idea that the former president, or any public figure, could use the machinery of the government to punish their critics should be a cause of outrage. And yet, the reaction seems muted. We are reminded that this has happened before and still, it continues.
One of the more frustrating aspects of this situation is the capitulation of media outlets. It’s a sad reality, but many networks, driven by profit, seem to have caved in the past. This is the reality of Trump’s tactics, and it undermines the very principles of free speech and a free press. Instead of standing up to the blatant abuse of power, they appear more concerned with avoiding the former president’s ire.
The question becomes: can they still defend this? This doesn’t align with traditional values and it seems as though some are willing to turn a blind eye to the whole thing. The responses from any remaining defenders will likely be convoluted, twisting themselves into knots to avoid acknowledging the truth, but it won’t matter.
And the public is largely aware of what is happening. The backlash and response from viewers is evident, and it’s significant. Kimmel’s audience numbers saw an increase, a clear indicator of public sentiment. The irony is that these “attacks” on free speech are actually boosting those under fire.
The issue here isn’t about what Kimmel said or didn’t say, and not about the content of his show. It’s about the former president’s willingness to weaponize his power against anyone who dares criticize him. And, further, to weaponize the media to shut down criticism.
The implications are truly frightening. This sets a precedent, for a president to be able to use the government to suppress the freedom of expression. What this truly says is that Trump is not fit to hold any kind of office, and that any kind of democracy will not let someone like him take office ever again.