By John Q. Hosedrinker 
For decades, the United States has cultivated a strong relationship with India, viewing it as a crucial ally. However, former President Trump’s actions, including claiming credit for resolving a conflict between India and Pakistan, imposing tariffs, and embracing Pakistan’s army chief, have damaged this relationship. This has resulted in uniting India’s political factions against the US, shattering Modi’s image, and harming the economic ties between the two nations. Despite the potential for long-term damage, India is likely to recover, but the trust built over three decades will take considerable time to restore. Ultimately, the lasting impact of these events may be the United States’ loss of a key ally.
Read the original article here
The U.S. wooed India for 30 years. Trump blew that up in a few months. It’s a blunt assessment, but that seems to be the crux of what’s been going on, doesn’t it? It’s like watching a carefully cultivated garden, thriving for decades, and then seeing someone just… bulldoze it. The narrative suggests a long-term investment in a relationship with India, a patient build-up of economic and strategic ties, all for it to be potentially undone in a relatively short period. The core issue, as articulated by various comments, is a perceived shift in U.S. foreign policy, moving towards a more isolationist stance, prioritizing short-term gains, and perhaps, even, a degree of disinterest in international alliances.
The potential consequences of this shift are pretty significant. India, as everyone seems to agree, is poised to become a major player on the world stage. Its economic growth, its increasing influence, and its strategic importance as a counterweight to China make it a valuable partner. Many comments highlight India’s rising economic power, with impressive growth rates and attractive investment opportunities. The opportunities for U.S. companies, like increased aircraft orders, are potentially lost. The idea is that the U.S. was positioned to benefit handsomely from India’s rise, and now that opportunity is somehow threatened.
And it’s not just about economics, of course. The relationship with India was also seen as a strategic one, a way to balance against China’s growing dominance. The U.S. had invested in defense ties, and the two countries were apparently finding common ground in various areas. The sudden change in tone and policy might be seen as a major misstep, pushing India towards other partners, potentially strengthening ties with Russia and China, a result nobody in the US really wanted.
The actions and policies of the Trump administration, as viewed by some, seem to have actively undermined these efforts. The imposition of tariffs, a perceived lack of interest in traditional alliances, and a general “America First” approach are cited as factors that damaged the relationship. Some people feel that this was an act of short-sightedness, prioritizing immediate gains over long-term strategic goals. It’s been said that Trump made quick decisions, and that those decisions were, to put it bluntly, dumb, in that they undermined decades of diplomatic work.
There is also the view that India’s own interests always come first. India’s history of non-alignment, its reliance on Russia for defense, and its willingness to prioritize its own economic and strategic considerations are all factors to consider. Some people think that the U.S. was never going to “win” India over, as the country has its own agenda.
The comments also raise questions about the motivations behind these changes. Some point to a desire for isolationism and economic protectionism, a belief that America doesn’t need the rest of the world. The idea is to retreat from the global stage and focus inward. This stance seems counterproductive, especially when considering the potential for global trade.
The reaction, as portrayed in various comments, suggests that Trump’s approach created a lot of short-term damage. There are also accusations that the actions benefited certain individuals or groups at the expense of the broader national interest. The impression is that of a missed opportunity, a squandering of years of diplomatic efforts for some ill-defined gain.
It’s not an entirely one-sided story. Some people believe that the U.S. was right to be more assertive with India, especially regarding its relationship with Russia. From this perspective, the Trump administration was acting in the best interests of Ukraine. Regardless of the specific political stance, the point of the comments is that the U.S. may have to reassess its relationship with India in the coming years.
Overall, the assessment points to a significant shift in U.S.-India relations. A long-term strategy of engagement and cooperation has been compromised by actions and policies. Whether the relationship can be repaired, or whether it will continue to shift towards China and Russia, remains to be seen.