The recently released 238-page birthday book of Jeffrey Epstein contains multiple mentions of Donald Trump. Included in the book is a birthday letter allegedly written by Trump to Epstein, featuring a sexually suggestive doodle and signature, which the White House dismissed as a hoax. Furthermore, Trump’s name appears in a photograph depicting Epstein with businessman Joel Pashcow, who wrote a letter referencing a woman they both socialized with and a mock check from “DJ Trump.” Pashcow’s contact information was also found in Epstein’s address book, and he donated to Trump’s campaign in 2016.

Read the original article here

Trump Hit by More Epstein Ties in Pedo’s Twisted Birthday Book

The news cycle, it seems, just can’t quit Jeffrey Epstein. And now, the dark web of his connections has ensnared Donald Trump once more. This time, it’s the twisted “birthday book,” a collection of potentially disturbing entries, that’s throwing fuel on the fire. Based on what’s coming out, it’s not just about proximity anymore; it’s about the nature of the relationship and the content of these private exchanges.

The details that have emerged, the unsettling language used, paints a disturbing picture. The claims of a drawing of a pre-pubescent girl, and the raunchy poem – it’s the kind of thing that leaves you speechless, isn’t it? And it’s not just one thing; it’s the context. The birthday book entries, when seen together, seem to build a narrative, a horrifying, potentially criminal narrative. What we’re talking about is not a passing acquaintance, but a level of entanglement that’s hard to ignore. The accusation that a picture of a check from Trump to Epstein for $22,500, related to a “fully depreciated” young girl, is a chilling suggestion, and the implications are devastating.

The response of some of Trump’s supporters – dismissing it as a hoax or “locker room humor” – is deeply unsettling. The willingness to downplay such serious allegations is a form of complicity, isn’t it? The evidence, based on these reports, is building. It’s not just one person saying these things; it’s a chorus of voices, sharing concerns. The call for transparency is loud and clear. If there’s nothing to hide, then open up the books, release the full context of these entries.

Then there are the financial aspects. That specific check for $22,500, the suggestion of girls being sold – it’s all about money, exploitation, and power. The redacted terms are probably related to an asset. The potential involvement of Melania is a devastating suggestion, if true. This goes beyond mere association; it speaks to a deeper, more sinister arrangement.

The timing of this revelation is particularly striking. Just when the world thought it was starting to understand the extent of Epstein’s network, another layer is revealed. It makes you wonder: what else is out there? Who else is involved? The archived articles show the depth of the allegations and the need for a thorough investigation. The connections and relationships in these files may be extensive.

The silence from certain corners is also deafening. Those who were loudly proclaiming to be fighting sex trafficking, but are now quiet, it’s a stark contrast. The media that once championed a cause now seems to avoid it. It’s hard not to draw conclusions.

The calls for accountability have been growing, for a long time, and this new information is only accelerating that process. If these allegations are true, it isn’t just political damage; it’s a deep moral failing. When will we see the full release of the birthday book and see what the other entries say?