By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The President’s responses to the assassinations of Melissa Hortman and Charlie Kirk starkly contrasted, revealing a partisan approach to human life. While Hortman’s death received minimal attention, Kirk’s was framed as a national tragedy, prompting lowered flags, posthumous awards, and a video address promising vengeance against the left. Further fueling the issue, Trump appeared on Fox News suggesting that violence from the right was more defensible, indicating right-wing extremists are part of his political project. This selective mourning, coupled with his past actions, suggests a willingness to overlook or even encourage political violence from those on the right, thus implicitly devaluing the lives of Democrats.
Read the original article here
Trump’s partisan double standard for assassinations is chilling because it reveals a deeply troubling disregard for human life, particularly when viewed through the lens of political allegiance. It’s as if there’s one set of rules for his “people” and a completely different, and often brutal, set for anyone he deems an enemy. This isn’t just about disagreeing on policy; it’s about the very value placed on individuals, a value that seems to fluctuate wildly depending on their political leanings. This lack of consistency, this willingness to shift the moral goalposts, is what truly makes it chilling.
Trump’s apparent indifference, and sometimes even outright glee, at the misfortunes of those he views as adversaries is a recurring theme. The fact that he seems to derive political advantage from tragedy, especially when it involves violence, is a disturbing trend. The very notion of celebrating, or at least not condemning, violence against perceived enemies is an erosion of basic human decency. The silence, the deflection, the subtle encouragement – these are the tools of a dangerous game, and it is one that he seems all too eager to play.
This double standard is not simply a matter of opinion; it’s a fundamental aspect of his political strategy. It serves to solidify his base, to demonize his opponents, and to create an “us versus them” mentality that fosters division and animosity. By consistently framing events through a partisan lens, Trump is able to manipulate the narrative, control the conversation, and maintain his grip on power. This involves fear-mongering and intimidation, tactics of choice when wielding a base of supporters.
The examples are numerous and telling. Whether it involves his comments on school shootings, or his reactions to political violence, there’s a clear pattern of selective outrage and a readiness to exploit tragedy for political gain. His historical approach to the law and religion gives him a platform to hold sway in the hearts and minds of some of the most vulnerable of society.
It’s also important to consider the broader implications of this double standard. It normalizes a culture of hate and intolerance, where violence is seen as a justifiable response to disagreement. This can be viewed as an acceptance, or even an encouragement, of political violence. Such a message, amplified by his considerable influence, has the potential to incite further acts of aggression.
The consistent references to the Epstein files, for instance, underscore the deep-seated distrust of institutions and the potential for explosive revelations to fuel further polarization. Trump’s actions and reactions surrounding the files, whatever they may contain, will certainly be viewed through this same partisan lens, with his supporters likely to dismiss any criticism as a politically motivated attack.
It’s no coincidence that we hear talk of “in-groups” protected by law and “out-groups” bound by law. This is a well-worn playbook, a hallmark of authoritarian regimes, where the lines between right and wrong become blurred and morality becomes a tool for wielding power. These are the people that don’t want to read history and apply it.
The core issue is that Trump’s primary focus is power and vengeance against his enemies. The truth is often a casualty in this kind of environment. His objective is to create chaos and division and exploit them to his advantage. This is what can make it a “dark hole”.
In a world where truth is often subjective, where facts are easily twisted, and where personal attacks are the norm, it’s essential to remain vigilant and critically assess the words and actions of those in positions of power. This includes recognizing the insidious nature of the double standard, and its potential to erode the very foundations of a just and civil society. It is, indeed, chilling.