By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Former President Trump has threatened to declare a national emergency in Washington, D.C., due to Mayor Muriel Bowser’s decision to end cooperation between the Metropolitan Police Department and ICE. Trump, in a Truth Social post, claimed his actions had dramatically reduced crime in the city and criticized Bowser for bowing to pressure from the “Radical Left Democrats.” He stated that he would call a national emergency and federalize the city if necessary to prevent crime from “roaring back.” Bowser has stated that immigration enforcement is not within the MPD’s purview, and she created an Emergency Operations Center to address the issues Trump highlighted.
Read the original article here
Trump Threatens to Declare New National Emergency in Late-Night Meltdown
It’s becoming a recurring theme, isn’t it? The late-night meltdowns, the frenzied pronouncements, and the ever-present threat of a “national emergency.” The news is buzzing again because Trump is hinting at invoking emergency powers, this time over the issue of crime in Washington, D.C. – or, at least, that’s what he wants us to believe. It feels a lot like a playbook at this point, doesn’t it? Fabricate a crisis, declare an emergency, and then… who knows what comes next?
The comments are a bit of a word salad to unpack. The core of it seems to be Trump’s displeasure with the Mayor of D.C., and her perceived lack of cooperation with federal agencies regarding immigration. He’s linking this to a potential rise in crime, and using that as the rationale for, well, something. It’s a bit murky, honestly. The specific details of the threat involve “federalizing” the city, which is something that is usually done in the face of a natural disaster and not the regular day to day of city government.
The language used is inflammatory, the tone is agitated, and the overall impression is one of someone grasping for control, which is often an indication of a man in dire financial trouble and not in a state of sound mental health. The whole thing smacks of desperation, and a desperate man will do anything to stay in power. The emergency may or may not happen, though it feels like a way to deflect from the real emergency of this man’s mental state.
The reaction is pretty predictable. Many people are expressing a sense of weariness, and a call to address the situation by either the 25th Amendment or by legal prosecution. The lack of concern for the damage caused by the ex-president has people worried. The use of these so-called emergencies seems almost arbitrary, and that makes people wonder what’s really going on. The sheer frequency with which Trump uses the term “national emergency” has led to a loss of faith in the declaration.
There’s also a palpable sense of disbelief. How many “national emergencies” can one person declare? Is it becoming a standard operating procedure at this point? There’s a deep skepticism about the actual substance behind the pronouncements, and a suspicion that they’re simply a way to sidestep normal procedures and consolidate power. The phrase “Boy Who Cried Wolf” comes to mind, because there is a crisis that has been going on for some time, but it has been ignored by the ex-president.
And then there’s the inevitable question of the Epstein files. It’s clear that the ongoing interest in these files stems from a belief that they contain information that is being suppressed, either by Trump himself or by those around him. And as the comment rightly points out, the fact that they’re still being talked about this much suggests there’s still a lot that people want to know.
Beyond the immediate issue of the threatened emergency, there’s a wider concern about the erosion of democratic norms. There’s a worrying trend of someone trying to circumvent existing laws and institutions, which is the bedrock of democracy. The suggestion that this man may use “emergency” powers to get his way raises serious questions about his respect for the legal system.
The response to all of this shows the political arena is still highly charged, with people expressing anger, frustration, and a sense of helplessness. The call for attention to be paid to the sycophants in congress is a testament to the feeling of the need for accountability. The ex-president’s actions are not happening in a vacuum. This is a situation that deserves continued scrutiny.