By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following David Letterman’s labeling of President Trump as an “authoritarian,” Trump swiftly responded with a disparaging Truth Social post, criticizing Letterman’s career and appearance. Letterman’s comments were made in response to Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension by ABC, prompted by FCC Chair Brendan Carr’s threats over Kimmel’s remarks regarding the murder of Charlie Kirk. The FCC chair called Kimmel’s statement “malicious lies”. Letterman’s remarks touched on the issue of media censorship and the consequences of criticizing Trump. This instance is not isolated, as Trump has previously targeted other late-night hosts, underscoring a pattern of direct engagement with and criticism of those voices.
Read the original article here
Trump, 79, Snaps at David Letterman for Calling Him Out on Kimmel | The president did not like Letterman labeling him an “authoritarian criminal.” Well, here’s the lowdown: it seems the former president, at the ripe old age of 79, is not taking kindly to being called out. Specifically, he’s apparently got his feathers ruffled because David Letterman, the legendary late-night host, didn’t mince words and labeled him an “authoritarian criminal.” You know, the truth often stings, doesn’t it?
This whole situation really boils down to a simple point: if you don’t want to be labeled a certain thing, then maybe don’t *be* that thing. In this case, the implication is that if the former president didn’t act like an “authoritarian criminal,” people wouldn’t be using those words to describe him. It’s the old “actions have consequences” thing. Seems pretty straightforward, right?
The core of the issue, it seems, is also that Letterman is no longer on the air. The reaction suggests a level of frustration, perhaps a bit of powerlessness. He can’t go to network executives and complain, demanding they fire Letterman for these perceived slights, because Letterman is happily retired. The inability to exert that kind of control, or even the desire to do so, seems to be a factor here.
Now, let’s be clear: it seems like the former president doesn’t like facts that contradict his narrative. This is not exactly new. We’ve seen this kind of reaction before. The response isn’t about the merits of the argument; it’s about the perceived disrespect, the personal attack. This whole situation feels like an extension of the old “old man yells at cloud” meme, doesn’t it?
People are pointing out the irony here, too. The person being called an “authoritarian criminal” is reacting… well, in a way that some might consider authoritarian. He’s seemingly annoyed by the criticism, which is another aspect of the situation to consider. It’s almost as if he’s confirming the very label he dislikes.
The interesting part is the dynamic between the former president and figures from television. He’s a frequent guest on many shows. This whole incident, from the outside, feels as if only people from TV are able to get under his skin. It’s a peculiar thing to watch.
Another sentiment running through the reactions is, in essence, “Don’t be one.” The implication is clear: if you don’t want to be called an authoritarian criminal, then stop behaving like one. The simplicity of the argument is quite striking.
Someone even brought up the fact that the former president was on Letterman’s show over 30 times. It makes you wonder about the nature of the relationship. Did he view Letterman as some kind of friend? Maybe he did. The whole situation is probably just highlighting the difference between the sycophants and the people who can deliver the truth.
There is a lot of commentary that says Letterman is just calling it as he sees it, and that millions, or even billions, share that view. That point is a pretty significant element of this situation. It adds context to the former president’s reaction.
It’s almost as if people are asking whether he spends his days on the phone, constantly monitoring what celebrities say about him, or if there’s some assistant feeding him this information constantly. Which makes you wonder about the state of mind, doesn’t it?
The reactions are quite clear in saying, “The truth hurts.” The irony and the perceived hypocrisy are recurring themes. If something walks like a duck and quacks like a duck… you get the idea.
There’s also a strong sentiment that the former president is, shall we say, thin-skinned. People are suggesting that he is unable to handle criticism. The idea is, “Don’t be such a snowflake, Donnie.” Which is a rather pointed jab.
Lots of people are stating they would love to see a debate between the two. Considering the relative age and sharpness, the feeling is that Letterman would win. The age difference makes it a particularly interesting dynamic.
The idea that Trump is in the Epstein Files also comes into play. This seems to be a reference to the numerous accusations against him. And there is the acknowledgement that it’s impossible to get Letterman removed.
Another point is the question of behavior and identity. If someone acts in a certain way, people will label them accordingly. It’s a basic principle of human perception. The reaction is very straightforward.
Many people are of the opinion that if the former president doesn’t want to be labeled as such, then he should not behave in a way that warrants the label. It’s a simple and very clear argument.
There is also a question being asked, “When will someone just tell that fat orange toddler tough shit?” The sentiment is clear: people are tired of the drama, and the implication is, the former president needs to toughen up.
There is a good amount of feeling that he is losing it a little lately, with increased snapping at people, making him seem cranky and bullying.
And ultimately, the words “authoritarian dictator wannabe who raped kids” are uttered. The sentiment being, the former president, can’t take the criticism he dishes out. The central core of the story here is a former president getting called out, and not liking it.