By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Donald Trump is seeking unprecedented power over U.S. fiscal and monetary policy through several cases before the Supreme Court. One case concerns Trump’s tariffs, which he claims are valid without Congressional approval, potentially raising trillions in new taxes. Another case involves Trump’s ability to impound funds, essentially refusing to spend money appropriated by Congress. Finally, Trump is attempting to gain the power to fire a member of the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors. If Trump is successful in these cases, he could gain dictatorial control over the U.S. economy.
Read the original article here
Trump asks the Supreme Court to give him total control over the US economy – and it’s time to unpack the implications. This isn’t just about a shift in policy; it’s a potential seismic event that could reshape the very fabric of American financial stability, and the opinions on this are incredibly strong.
The core concern revolves around the notion of the Executive branch overstepping its boundaries and seizing power traditionally reserved for the Legislature, a scenario with echoes of the “Biden v. Nebraska” Supreme Court case. The precedent set there, specifically concerning the “major questions doctrine” and the “power of the purse,” acts as a chilling backdrop. The argument against allowing Trump this kind of control stems from the sheer economic magnitude involved – potentially trillions of dollars at stake. Some sources have pointed out that the actions requested would dwarf the impact of even significant government programs, raising red flags about the potential for economic instability.
The gravity of the situation is amplified when considering Trump’s history with finances. The idea of handing over the reins of the US economy to someone with a record of multiple business bankruptcies, including casinos, is raising a significant amount of skepticism. This is where the fear of the “Great Depression times ten” enters the discussion – a scenario of economic collapse. The potential consequences include hyperinflation, a worthless dollar, and a devastating blow to the financial well-being of everyday Americans.
The very prospect evokes historical parallels, specifically the rise of fascism, with Franklin D. Roosevelt’s warning about the dangers of private power eclipsing the democratic state. The concern is that granting this level of control could pave the way for a system where the economy serves the interests of an individual rather than the collective good. The question becomes, is the government simply taking the next step into fascism?
Beyond the immediate economic ramifications, the potential for political repercussions cannot be ignored. Some believe that this move could signal a further erosion of democratic principles, even to the point where the legislative branch becomes virtually powerless. The worry is that this power grab isn’t just about economics; it’s about consolidating control.
Critics point out that the request for control is deeply ironic, given the long history of the Republican party advocating for a “small government” and “free market”. They see this as a complete betrayal of those principles.
The response has been far from silent. Concerns are being raised about the risk of severe economic consequences, echoing the warnings about the potential for unprecedented economic hardship. This creates a sense of urgency and the need for a re-evaluation.
And, finally, the question remains: Is this a path towards economic ruin or a calculated move to consolidate power? The stakes are undeniably high, and the implications are far-reaching.