By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump indicated he may reconsider sending troops to Portland to protect ICE facilities, claiming they are “under attack.” In a Sunday interview, he mentioned conversations with Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek, who suggested the situation on the ground differs from his perception, and Mayor Keith Wilson, who stated no intervention is needed. Although Trump has described Portland as a hotbed of insurrection, officials in the state have indicated that they can handle public safety without military assistance. Despite these recent statements, the administration is still deciding.
Read the original article here
Trump seems to be backing off his plan to send military forces into Portland, and the reason is… well, it’s pretty wild. The man himself, in a moment that’s simultaneously alarming and almost comical, seemed to question his own perception of reality. “Am I watching things on television that are different from what’s happening?” he reportedly asked. The question, if you think about it, is a rather damning self-assessment of how he gets his information. The President of the United States, the leader of the free world, apparently gets his intel from Fox News.
It’s hard to know where to begin with this one. He was seemingly prepared to send in troops based on what he was seeing on television, then had second thoughts? This feels like a moment that demands a deep breath, because it truly underscores how much the narrative can be shaped and how easily that can then impact decision-making at the highest levels of government. Consider the implications. He was getting ready to deploy the military, based on, as he seems to be acknowledging, potentially biased or even outright false information, rather than real, actionable intelligence from his own people. The Governor, after a conversation with him, was even able to convey to him that the city was not, in fact, in a state of all-out war, or even particularly dangerous.
This incident raises serious questions, doesn’t it? There are worries that those close to him are taking advantage of his apparent vulnerability. And then there are the broader concerns about cognitive decline. This isn’t a new theme, but it’s hard to ignore when the leader of the country is seemingly unsure of what’s real and what’s not. Some even pointed out an incident where Trump posted and then quickly deleted an AI-generated video.
The irony, as some have mentioned, is thick. Supporters of the former President were often highly critical of his opponents for their perceived mental acuity. Now, the tables seem to be turned. It’s a situation where the lines between reality and perception have become dangerously blurred. A president who is reliant on television news, who seems to be confusing the real world with its televised portrayal… It’s a difficult situation. It’s one that makes you question the basic tenets of leadership, and the kind of critical thinking that we would expect from those in positions of power.
The fact that the Governor of Oregon, a supposed political foe, had to essentially clarify that the city wasn’t a war zone is a pretty remarkable indicator of the state of affairs. Consider, too, that the President’s own advisors were apparently feeding him information that seems to have been demonstrably false. It all goes to show the degree of influence and manipulation that can be at play when the person at the top is vulnerable to these sorts of influences. His own statement is a clear sign that, in his own mind, there may have been a disconnect between what he was seeing on TV and what his team was telling him, and then eventually the reality of the situation.
The comments are also littered with observations about the media itself. Fox News, which is frequently cited as the source of the problem. Some speculate about how old footage might be deceptively edited to create a false narrative. Some are suggesting that the small font size stating the date the footage was taken, that could be easily missed by the viewer, could be designed to trick the viewer. The implications are serious: the manipulation of the media, the deliberate distortion of information.
This instance, the whole thing, raises so many troubling points that it’s hard to know where to begin. The use of potentially false intelligence to justify deploying troops, the President’s reliance on television for information, the potential for manipulation, and the questions surrounding his mental state are all worrying things. They paint a picture of a situation that is, to put it mildly, a bit unsettling.
Then, there’s the question of accountability. Who exactly is feeding him this information? Is it deliberate misinformation? Is there no one around him that can say, “Hey, maybe we should get a second opinion on this”? Or is it simply a case of “what you see is what you get,” with a leader who is easily misled?
This whole affair underscores the dangers of a society where the lines between fact and fiction, reality and entertainment, have become so blurred. If the President of the United States can’t tell the difference, where does that leave the rest of us? It’s a chilling question, and it should cause anyone to stop and think about what we are watching.