By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The article discusses the charges against Congresswoman LaMonica McIver, who is facing potential imprisonment for allegedly interfering with federal law enforcement. The charges stem from an incident during an attempted arrest of Mayor Ras Baraka, where McIver made brief physical contact with officers. These charges are seen as a test of an authoritarian tactic. If found guilty, McIver may lose all of her money that she uses for the campaign, which leads to the conclusion that Trump’s real goal is to bankrupt those that oppose him and make it so they cannot win. This is a violation of the Speech and Debate Clause, which prevents the executive from weaponizing criminal charges against members of Congress.
Read the original article here
Trump’s prosecution of a Democratic lawmaker is a test run for authoritarian rule. It’s hard to ignore the pattern, it really is. It feels like we’re watching a plan unfold, a full-blown execution of a strategy. The pieces are falling into place, and it’s alarming. This isn’t just a trial run; it’s the undeniable march towards authoritarianism. The idea of a loyalty test, gathering all the Generals in one place, it’s not some far-off possibility, it’s happening right now.
The fact that this is playing out with a focus on a Democratic lawmaker is very telling. The case of Representative LaMonica McIver, facing the possibility of 17 years in prison, is a stark indicator of this shift. The indictment against former FBI Director James Comey is another layer. This comes after Trump’s directive to target his perceived enemies, including McIver, hinting at a deliberate targeting of political opponents. This case isn’t just about the specifics of the law; it’s about the intent to silence opposition and consolidate power. Even the swift dropping of charges against Mayor Ras Baraka, who was initially arrested with McIver, and the federal judge’s labeling of the arrest as a “worrisome misstep” underscores the political nature of this prosecution. It feels like they’re stress testing the system, pushing boundaries to see what they can get away with.
The approval ratings supporting Trump, especially within the Republican ranks, is critical. This isn’t a fringe movement; it’s a consolidated force. That level of support will embolden those in power to keep going. The media echo chamber further complicates things. The consistent barrage of misinformation and biased narratives makes it incredibly difficult for a clear understanding of the real situation to cut through. The only short-term impact that actually makes it through seems to be those of the Epstein case, where the harm to children was undeniable. The challenge is how to break through these barriers, how to get accurate information to the people.
The speed with which these events are happening is important to consider. It’s not a slow creep; it’s a rapid advance. It feels like the “flood the zone” strategy – trying everything, seeing what sticks, and pushing the limits. The idea of a “test run” is misleading. They’re not testing anymore; they’re acting. The judiciary’s complicity, or at least its willingness to allow these things to go through, will be a critical determinant of the rule of law. There’s a distinct possibility that this is just the beginning. The fact that Trump’s actions consistently target women of color raises serious concerns.
The potential for abuse of power is enormous. If the goal is to jail political opponents, what’s the limit? If there’s no consequence for prosecuting an innocent person, then the game is over. We should be very aware that if this tactic is used, a whole string of these kangaroo trials will become the norm. The importance of mid-term elections cannot be overstated. The call for a “blue wave” in 2026 reflects the urgency to counter this trend. The goal is to make sure the system can maintain its integrity.