By John Q. Hosedrinker 
President Trump recently signed a proclamation introducing a new annual $100,000 fee for H-1B visa applications, targeting highly skilled foreign workers, and unveiled a “gold card” visa program with a potential pathway to U.S. citizenship. This “gold card” requires a $1 million contribution, while a “platinum card” is offered for a $5 million contribution with extended stay benefits. These actions face potential legal challenges and widespread criticism, particularly as the H-1B program, designed to attract specialized workers, has been accused of being exploited to depress wages. The H-1B changes seek to prevent companies from using the visa for entry-level training positions, instead targeting highly sophisticated engineers.
Read the original article here
Trump signs proclamation imposing $100K annual fee for H-1B visa applications. Well, here we go. It appears that the former President has signed a proclamation, not just an executive order, slapping a hefty $100,000 annual fee onto H-1B visa applications. It makes you wonder, right off the bat, what the immediate implications of this are. This is a huge sum, and it immediately raises questions about how it will impact both companies and the skilled workers who rely on these visas.
The question that immediately pops into mind: How will this affect businesses that rely on H-1B workers? It seems like the financial burden is going to be substantial, and it’s worth pondering the financial calculus involved. How much does a company have to value a prospective employee to make this cost justifiable? A company is going to think very hard about that. This could very well be the death knell for numerous foreign investment projects within the United States. It may also further discourage some of the best and brightest from coming to the U.S. for work.
There are some pretty strong opinions here, and it’s easy to see why. The H-1B visa program has long been a source of both praise and criticism. Supporters of the program often point to its importance in attracting skilled workers, especially in the tech and medical fields. These skilled professionals can fill roles where American workers are scarce or not available, which is crucial for technological advancement and economic growth. But there are also legitimate concerns about wage suppression and the potential for exploitation, which is why the program is so hotly debated.
This $100,000 fee will likely create significant issues for smaller companies, forcing them to make difficult choices. This is especially true for startups and smaller tech companies. These entities may struggle to afford such a significant upfront cost per employee and they might opt to offshore more jobs, as others mentioned. The implications are substantial.
Now, what about the impact on the skilled workers themselves? Some of the people who benefit from H-1Bs are doctors, surgeons, engineers, and others who have a lot of training. Will these talented people, who the U.S. economy greatly benefits from, be deterred by such an enormous price tag? What happens if they choose to seek opportunities elsewhere, to countries that are more welcoming? This is a serious risk.
The discussion also touches on the broader economic picture. One of the biggest concerns is the potential for the US to lose its competitive edge, especially in technological development. If the fees are too high, the US may lose out on some of the best talent, which ultimately will harm the country. One of the main concerns is how it affects the healthcare sector and whether this will make it harder to staff hospitals.
And speaking of the workforce, if U.S. companies offshore jobs, who suffers? The American workers that are left behind. They might be marginalized due to time zone differences and other challenges.
Some express concerns that this action could be a blatant cash grab or a way for Trump to reward certain companies with waivers. And of course, the broader context is that this is being done in the absence of any real action from Congress. How is this possible, they wonder. Why aren’t these decisions being questioned or challenged more? And as the concerns get deeper, people are asking about how it will impact the tech industries.
This raises another point: the underlying issues that lead to this kind of move in the first place. The need for skilled workers, the reliance on immigration to fill these gaps, it’s something that stems from, as someone put it, years of underfunded public education and the high costs of higher education. It’s a complex issue with multiple layers.
The conversation also brings up the point that is that raising wages to attract American workers wasn’t in the cards for Trump. His past actions also included hiring temporary foreign workers to staff his own businesses, which further shows the inconsistencies of this policy.
Let’s be clear: if this goes into effect, there will be serious repercussions. The U.S. runs the risk of losing a lot of valuable talent very quickly, potentially handing a massive competitive advantage to countries like Korea, China, and India. The underlying message is loud and clear: the current administration is making a mistake.