Trump Authorizes “Full Force” Military in Portland: Concerns of Unlawful Order

Trump says he is authorizing military to use ‘Full Force’ in Portland, a statement that immediately raises alarm bells. The sheer absurdity of the claim that Portland is “war ravaged” is frankly baffling. The image conjured – of a city under siege, requiring a military intervention – is completely divorced from reality. Reports from individuals living in Portland paint a picture of a place far from a war zone, with fall colors and generally peaceful conditions. It’s difficult to understand what threat the military would even be responding to.

The very idea of deploying the military with “full force” against citizens, without any apparent justification, is deeply concerning. It suggests an open authorization for potentially lethal force, raising serious questions about the rule of law and the potential for abuse of power. The context around this announcement suggests it’s not about genuine security concerns but political theater. The claim of “Antifa and other domestic terrorists” attacking ICE facilities seems like an excuse rather than a legitimate reason to escalate the situation.

A chilling aspect of this situation is the fear that such an action might be perceived as acceptable by a segment of the population. The idea that a significant portion of the country might condone or even support the use of military force against protestors or citizens is deeply disturbing. The potential for political violence is a very real possibility if the situation continues to be fueled by political rhetoric.

The legal framework that would allow for this action is extremely unclear. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 generally restricts the use of federal troops for domestic law enforcement. The President’s announcement appears to be an end-run around the law, as he has declared what is in effect “war” as the circumstance in Portland. The situation highlights the importance of Congress and its role of declaring war.

The apparent disregard for the state of Oregon and the Governor of the state suggests a blatant power grab. It is essential that the state government assert its authority and resist this encroachment. Trump’s actions echo a common theme from the far right, that of a “boogeyman” Portland, a fabricated narrative of an anarchist dystopia, designed to mobilize the base. The reality on the ground is far different.

The motivations behind this announcement are also suspect. Some speculate that the President is attempting to distract from other ongoing events, like the release of the Epstein files. The timing and the nature of the announcement certainly lend credence to the idea that it’s a move designed to capture the news cycle and control the narrative. Other concerns are raised that it could be a strategic move in an attempt to end Democracy or use it to reject election results and stay in power.

The potential implications of this order are far-reaching. It’s a betrayal of the fundamental principles of American democracy. The use of military force against civilians would set a dangerous precedent and could lead to further escalation. The response of the military brass and the willingness of soldiers to follow what appears to be an unlawful order are both essential factors that will shape how this crisis will unfold.

The situation demands an immediate response from multiple sources. The Governor of Oregon, members of Congress, and the judiciary must all act to ensure that the rule of law is upheld. Every American needs to understand that actions like this must be challenged. It’s a critical moment for the country.