By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Governor JB Pritzker expressed caution regarding President Trump’s shifting stance on deploying National Guard troops to Chicago, noting silence from sources connected to the administration. Trump had previously indicated he would announce a deployment to a different city, a move that would be a political victory for Pritzker. While the threat of military deployment appears to have diminished for now, Pritzker anticipates an increase in federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement activities. This announcement was made the same day Trump announced the “Midway Blitz,” a measure that has not yet significantly increased arrests.
Read the original article here
President Donald Trump seems to pump brakes on deploying National Guard troops to Chicago. It seems like a story that has a lot of layers, and frankly, it’s a bit fascinating to dissect. The initial impression, drawn from the chatter, is that Trump was, or at least appeared to be, considering sending in the National Guard. Then, as quickly as the idea surfaced, it began to recede. It’s almost as if a course correction happened, a sudden shift in direction. The reasons offered, and the interpretations of these, are varied, and that’s where things get interesting.
The immediate observation appears to be, “Well done, Chicago. You scared him.” This implies that some kind of resistance or pushback from Chicago’s authorities, or perhaps even the general public, caused Trump to rethink his strategy. There’s a sense that the city stood its ground, and this, in turn, influenced Trump’s decision-making process. A very interesting perspective is that the act of sending troops into Chicago was an act of treason. This certainly adds a heavy, controversial element to the narrative, and really makes you think about the constitutional implications of such a move.
The conversation around the potential deployment also seems to indicate a shift in focus. Instead of Chicago, the suggestion is now Utah. There’s a noticeable pattern emerging, with the phrase “TACO” peppered throughout the discussion, representing the recurring theme: “Trump Always Chickens Out.” This phrase encapsulates a common sentiment: that Trump is all talk and little action, and that when faced with real resistance or potential for serious consequences, he backs down. The proposed shift towards Utah highlights this pattern, with the suggestion that the deployment could be redirected to address gun violence there.
It’s worth pointing out the speculation surrounding distractions. Some users suggested that Trump’s attention was diverted. The mention of Charlie Kirk and the Epstein files adds another layer to the conversation. The timing of events, with Kirk’s “assassination” and the potential house block on releasing the Epstein files, is proposed to have served as diversions, providing Trump with enough reasons to change his strategy on Chicago. It’s also inferred that the Chicago news could detract from the Utah news. The implication is that Trump is more concerned with managing public perception and controlling the narrative than addressing specific issues like crime in a direct manner.
Furthermore, the idea of Trump being a coward is brought up and repeated. It is suggested that he folds quickly when he faces real organized resistance. The argument that the potential deployment of National Guard troops to Chicago would have resulted in a “bloodbath” is a strong statement and reflects a high level of concern about the possible consequences of such a move. The “chuckle fuck yes men” surrounding him are speculated to have reached a similar conclusion. The fact that Trump is not worthy of the title “President” is mentioned, expressing a strong sentiment of disapproval.
A recurring theme is that Trump is unwilling to follow through on his promises, and that’s a significant factor in the conversation. There’s a hint of cynicism, a sense that the rhetoric is often exaggerated, and that Trump’s actions don’t match his words. The user’s tone is consistent, that the plan seems to be all talk.
The discourse points to a view that Trump has a tendency to change his plans and back down under pressure. He’s seen as someone who might make bold pronouncements but is ultimately hesitant to commit to significant action, especially when faced with the potential for negative outcomes or strong opposition. This pattern, according to the commenters, is what led to the “pumping of the brakes” on the National Guard deployment. This is what, in their view, is happening.