By John Q. Hosedrinker 
FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has threatened to revoke ABC’s broadcasting license in response to a Jimmy Kimmel joke about the suspected shooter of Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson. Carr accused Kimmel of spreading misinformation by playing into a narrative that Robinson was a “MAGA or Republican motivated person”. Carr suggested that if Disney and ABC did not take action against Kimmel, the FCC would intervene, citing their obligation to operate in the public interest. Legal experts and FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez have since condemned Carr’s statements, noting the FCC lacks the authority to control content and that such actions could suppress free speech.
Read the original article here
Powerful Trump Goon Directly Threatens Jimmy Kimmel – The FCC Chairman is claiming Kimmel deliberately spread misinformation when characterizing the MAGA response to details of Charlie Kirk’s alleged killer. This situation, to put it mildly, is deeply concerning. It’s a scenario where a powerful figure within the Trump administration, specifically the FCC Chairman, is directly threatening a media personality, Jimmy Kimmel, over statements made on his show. The crux of the issue is the accusation that Kimmel spread misinformation regarding the MAGA response to the details surrounding the alleged killer of Charlie Kirk.
The narrative, as it unfolds, paints a disturbing picture of potential political interference and the chilling effect it has on free speech. The FCC Chair’s actions, or perhaps more accurately, the perceived threats related to ABC’s broadcast license, suggest a deliberate attempt to silence dissenting voices. It’s important to note that the implication here isn’t just about Kimmel’s show; it’s about the broader implications for freedom of the press and the ability of media outlets to offer critical commentary.
The core of the controversy stems from Kimmel’s characterization of the MAGA response to the alleged killer. It seems, from the context, that Kimmel was critiquing how the MAGA community reacted, and in turn, those in power within the Trump administration took offense. The claim that Kimmel was spreading misinformation seems to be a pretext for silencing him, rather than a genuine concern for accuracy.
The response from the Trump administration is even more alarming. The White House’s “Rapid Response” team, and Trump himself, have issued statements. These responses, far from being measured or concerned about the alleged spread of misinformation, attack Kimmel directly, even celebrating the suspension of his show. This sort of reaction further underscores the politicization of the situation and the perceived attack on freedom of speech.
The cancellation of Kimmel’s show, though cloaked in the language of “business decisions,” is widely seen as a direct result of this pressure. The speed with which ABC and its affiliates acted, especially Nexstar, suggests the urgency of the situation. It’s a clear indication that the government’s threats were taken seriously, potentially leading to self-censorship within the media.
The timing of this situation is also critical. The fact that this is happening during a period where the FCC has approval over media ownership, raises serious concerns about the implications of the FCC Chairman’s actions.
The accusations of spreading misinformation, in this context, become a convenient tool for silencing critics. Kimmel did not claim the alleged killer was MAGA, but instead, Kimmel characterized the community’s response to the news. He was, in essence, critiquing the political spin that appeared to happen on this tragic event. This kind of rhetorical attack raises questions about the very definition of misinformation and the extent to which it can be weaponized to shut down opposing viewpoints.
The situation has sparked a range of reactions, from outrage to calls for boycotts of Disney. Many see this as a sign of a growing authoritarianism within the country, a suppression of voices that challenge the administration’s narrative. Some are drawing parallels to events in history, referencing the rise of authoritarian regimes, where control of the media became a key instrument of power.
This situation highlights a deeply troubling trend: the use of government agencies to punish and silence those who dare to criticize the administration. It’s a trend that erodes the foundations of democracy and threatens the very principles of freedom of speech and a free press. It will be interesting to see what John Oliver has to say, and what will become of late night TV.