By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During a recent appearance on “Fox & Friends,” President Trump advocated for a drastic overhaul of the U.S. justice system, suggesting that trials should be conducted with the speed of China’s system when a suspect is caught on camera committing a violent crime. He cited incidents like the recent train stabbing of Iryna Zarutska to support his call for “quick trials” and the death penalty, referencing the delays and potential appeals in the U.S. judicial process. This is not the first time Trump has expressed interest in such swift justice, previously suggesting summary execution for drug dealers and denigrating the U.S. system when it clashes with his interests. Republican lawmakers have previously expressed skepticism towards similar proposals.
Read the original article here
Trump Says U.S. Criminal Justice System Should Work More Like China’s, and it’s hard not to raise an eyebrow at that. It’s a statement that really makes you stop and think, especially given everything we know about his usual rhetoric. The idea of mirroring China’s system, where accountability for the wealthy and powerful is often swift and severe, raises a lot of questions.
Now, one of the immediate reactions to this is a sharp dose of irony. Many people point out that if the U.S. criminal justice system operated like China’s, Trump himself would likely be facing much harsher consequences, potentially even imprisonment. The long-running legal battles, the appeals, the motions – they wouldn’t exist in the same way. In China, things move far more quickly, and there’s a very different emphasis on due process. It’s a stark contrast to the way things have played out in his own legal cases.
Furthermore, the context of this statement is pretty important. Many people believe Trump’s statement is a reflection of his desire to see his political opponents face the same swift justice. It’s easy to see why some people feel he’s angling for a system that could more easily be used to silence dissent or punish those who cross him. His preference seems to be for a system where guilt is assumed, and the opportunities for defense and appeal are significantly curtailed, something he has not had to personally experience in the past.
This idea also clashes with core American values like individual rights and due process. The U.S. system, imperfect as it may be, is built on the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial. China’s system, on the other hand, often prioritizes the state’s interests above those of the individual. The differences are enormous.
Then there’s the obvious question of whether Trump truly understands the implications of what he’s saying. Given his history of praising authoritarian leaders and criticizing the U.S. justice system when it doesn’t work in his favor, it’s hard to know if he’s genuinely thought this through. Does he comprehend the drastic differences in approach? It certainly raises suspicions.
It’s also worth highlighting the hypocrisy of the situation. We often hear criticisms of China from certain sectors of the political spectrum, but now there’s a suggestion that our justice system should be more like theirs? It seems to create a very strange cognitive dissonance.
It’s no secret that Trump has a complicated relationship with China. While he has often used critical language, he’s also expressed admiration for leaders of other countries. The suggestion of modeling the U.S. justice system on China’s, therefore, requires a serious examination of motivations and possible consequences.
The timing of such statements is often relevant. The Supreme Court’s role in the current state of U.S. justice is also worth noting. Given that it is viewed by many as having a significant lean in his favor, the comments about mirroring a foreign government raises many concerns.
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, this statement should be a wake-up call for everyone. It’s an example of someone who seems to have very little respect for the institutions that define America. It raises questions about the future of American democracy if such ideas are taken seriously, and should give pause to everyone.