By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (Seco) is investigating Open Mineral, a commodities trader based in Baar, Switzerland, for potential violations of sanctions against Russia. The investigation concerns the alleged trading of gold from Russia, which would be a breach of sanctions implemented after the invasion of Ukraine. Open Mineral confirmed it is cooperating with authorities after a search of its premises last week. Seco confirmed the September 11th search in the canton of Zug and stated that the proceedings target two individuals and unknown persons.
Read the original article here
Swiss firm suspected of violating gold sanctions against Russia, and honestly, is anyone truly surprised? It seems like history might be repeating itself, and not in a good way. The State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (Seco) in Switzerland has opened an investigation into Open Mineral, a commodities trading firm based in Baar. The core of the issue? Suspicions that they violated sanctions against Russia, specifically concerning the trade of gold.
Open Mineral’s alleged transgression is clear: they’re accused of trading the precious metal originating from Russia, a direct breach of the sanctions imposed on Moscow following the invasion of Ukraine. This, of course, is where things get interesting, and where the historical context – however distasteful some might find it – becomes relevant. Remember the Swiss and their dealings with the Nazis during World War II? The echoes of that era, with its whispers of hidden wealth and questionable ethics, seem to resonate in this current situation.
The company itself hasn’t denied the investigation; in fact, they confirmed it. According to reports, authorities searched their premises last week as part of the probe, which is focused on business operations conducted in 2022. They’ve stated they’re cooperating with the investigation, and that business continues as usual. It’s a rather nonchalant approach, isn’t it? Seco, for their part, has acknowledged the raid on the company’s premises in the canton of Zug on September 11th. They’ve confirmed that the investigation is currently targeting two individuals, as well as “unknown persons,” and is focused on possible violations of the law related to the sanctions against Russia.
The timing of this investigation is crucial. Open Mineral established its Swiss office in 2016 and began operations in 2017. With a global presence spanning 11 cities and operations in over 50 countries, their involvement in such a potentially sanction-breaking affair raises some significant red flags. The inherent nature of Switzerland’s role in global finance – that’s the crux of it – makes cases like this all the more noteworthy. It’s a country that’s often seen as a hub, a place where money flows, but a place that also sometimes seems to turn a blind eye.
And, of course, the comments that have cropped up surrounding this news story are predictably pointed. The Swiss are being taken to task. The phrase “Swiss doing Swiss things” certainly summarizes a cynical view, implying a consistent pattern of behavior. There’s a certain, almost resigned, disappointment running through some of the comments. “Keeping tradition alive,” and “When in doubt, launder it out,” are sentiments that, rightly or wrongly, reflect a deep-seated distrust of Swiss financial dealings.
The specific references to historical parallels with Nazi Germany are provocative, but they underline the long-held criticism of Switzerland’s historical dealings with illicit funds. There’s a sense that the country has a tendency to operate in the shadows, and this case is simply the latest example. Some commentators express bewilderment about how the Swiss seemingly “get away with so much shady shit.”
There’s also the pointed question of double standards. Some comments suggest that because Switzerland, throughout its history, has been less than forthright in matters of moral and political principle, its role in these matters isn’t surprising. It makes one wonder why this situation, or similar situations, happen. One gets the sense that certain actions are simply considered ‘business as usual’ by the company itself and, by some, even by the country.
The fact that there’s a story here, that an investigation has been launched, is perhaps a small comfort. It suggests that there are mechanisms in place to hold people accountable. That’s crucial. And, as one commenter pointed out, without the presence of investigative actions, there would be no story. The spotlight of scrutiny is the only thing that can stop these types of events from happening.
It seems that Switzerland continues to be a place where the lines between ethical business practices and, well, the lack of them are, at best, blurred. The Open Mineral investigation serves as a clear reminder that the pursuit of profit can sometimes overshadow adherence to global standards, and the historical context around Switzerland makes it even more sensitive. The whole situation just leaves a bad taste in the mouth.