By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The Kremlin has affirmed its commitment to continuing its offensive in Ukraine, despite President Trump’s recent shift in perspective branding Russia a “paper tiger.” Moscow dismissed Trump’s suggestion that Ukraine could win and stated the necessity of continuing the war to secure Russian interests, while also downplaying the effectiveness of prior attempts at rapprochement with the U.S. Meanwhile, concerns are escalating in Europe as a result of increased Russian military activity, including airspace violations by Russian aircraft, and reports of GPS disturbances affecting European leaders’ flights near the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad. Concurrent with these developments, Ukraine has intensified its drone attacks on Russian oil and gas infrastructure, with strikes reported on a petrochemical plant and the deaths of civilians in southern Russia.
Read the original article here
Russia says no choice but war after Trump U-turn on Ukraine, which, if you really think about it, is a statement that’s been a long time coming. It’s almost as if they’re finally admitting what everyone else has known for ages. The whole “special military operation” charade seems to be wearing thin, doesn’t it? For years, they’ve been engaged in a conflict, and now it’s apparently a full-blown war because of someone else’s actions? It is difficult not to be skeptical about what they’ve done so far.
The fact that Russia is now seemingly embracing the term “war” feels like a rather dramatic shift in their public narrative. It’s like the old saying: “We do what we must, because we can.” The implication is that they were never truly at peace and that there was a plan all along. The history books seem to be full of their bluffs and misdirections, dating all the way back to the Cold War. Many of those nuclear missile silos that were supposed to be decommissioned? They were flooded with groundwater and inoperable. It makes you wonder what else they haven’t been entirely truthful about.
This pivot seems to stem from somewhere, but what’s really going on is a situation where Russia appears to have backed itself into a corner. Despite their claims, Russia’s military has struggled to achieve its goals, and the idea of them taking on more significant foes seems… ill-advised, to say the least. They are up against a resilient Ukrainian military and a united NATO. It sounds like a recipe for disaster.
The prevailing sentiment is that this is just a continuation of what they’ve been doing. They are making the situation about themselves, with threats and grand pronouncements. One can’t help but chuckle at the irony of them declaring war after years of a supposed “special military operation.” It’s like they’re trying to rewrite the rules mid-game, as if everyone hasn’t already seen their hand.
The overall view is that Russia’s military capabilities are not all they are cracked up to be. They have been relying on drone and artillery spam, and the use of a “meat grinder” approach. It’s a grim assessment, yet it aligns with the realities on the ground. If this is their strategy, how does this translate into a wider conflict? The world watches with bated breath, and the reality is not a pretty picture.
The reactions are a mix of frustration, skepticism, and a certain dark humor. The idea of Russia suddenly declaring war after everything that has already transpired is met with a sense of weary amusement. There’s a prevailing feeling that this is just another step in a predictable game, and nobody is buying it.
It also raises the question: what has changed to prompt this escalation? It’s a question that deserves to be asked. There is a deep skepticism about the Kremlin’s motives and sincerity. The notion that this is all a response to Trump’s actions is also dismissed.
The situation calls for a heavy dose of skepticism. The constant barrage of rhetoric and disinformation makes it hard to decipher the truth. However, it is hard to imagine how they could get involved with NATO, given their track record and current performance.
Many people believe that a declaration of war is more about their own internal needs. With a war declared, the economic burdens can be ignored, and the responsibility of action will be assigned to another party. This is their way of survival, and they have no choice but to double down, no matter what the cost.
Finally, let’s be frank. Regardless of what is said, Russia’s track record should be front and center. It has not been a force for stability, and it has a history of aggression and misdirection. It is time to acknowledge the reality.