By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Speaking at a G20 foreign ministers meeting, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov accused NATO and the European Union of waging a “real war” against Russia “through Ukraine.” Lavrov claimed the West provoked the conflict and is directly involved. These comments follow remarks from former US President Donald Trump, who suggested Ukraine could regain lost territories and that NATO should shoot down Russian aircraft. Lavrov’s statements occurred after a meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, where the latter urged Russia toward a resolution.
Read the original article here
Russian foreign minister claims NATO and EU have declared “real war” on Russia, and honestly, it’s becoming a bit of a broken record, isn’t it? It’s the same song and dance, repeated endlessly. It feels like every other week we’re hearing declarations of war, threats, and accusations. The constant drumbeat of these statements has diluted their impact, making it difficult to gauge the actual situation on the ground.
If you really boil it down, the underlying fear seems to be a simple one: what if NATO and the EU actually decide to directly engage? The prospect of a full-blown conflict is understandably unsettling, particularly for the EU nations who might be in the thick of it. The real question is, are these constant declarations a way to prepare the Russian people, or something more? Are they selling their people on a world war because they are losing a war they called a special operation?
The problem is, Russia has used the word “war,” and “nuke,” at every possible opportunity, to the point where the words have lost their significance. The constant repetition has desensitized the world, making it difficult to distinguish between genuine threats and empty rhetoric. The potential for miscalculation grows when such important terminology is used so carelessly. Before we can even react to the idea of war, we will find ourselves in it.
You have to ask yourself, who is the intended audience for this kind of talk? Is it the West, or is it the Russian population? The latter seems more likely. It’s about rallying the troops, justifying actions, and bolstering support for a cause that might be faltering. It’s a way to control the narrative, particularly domestically, by portraying Russia as a victim under siege.
If NATO and the EU were truly at war, it would be obvious. It wouldn’t require a declaration; the evidence would be clear. In reality, the situation is far more complex, and these pronouncements can be seen as an attempt to shape perceptions and manage the domestic political landscape. Maybe it’s a bully playing the victim now that they might get punched back. It’s like that kid on the playground always starting a fight and then crying when things don’t go his way.
The underlying reality, though, is that many people are just tired of hearing it. It’s the same script, the same accusations, the same posturing. The news cycle becomes a repetitive loop, and the actual issues are lost in the noise. It is a classic example of the boy who cried wolf – when the time comes, will anyone even pay attention?
So, why keep listening? The most impactful response would be actions, not words. Ignoring these statements and focusing on what matters – security and strategic interests – is probably the best approach. It’s time to tune out the noise and concentrate on reality.
The truth is, Russia has been at war for some time, albeit under a different guise. The current situation in Ukraine is far from a “special military operation” and has exposed the limitations of the Russian military, which continues to struggle. Russia’s poor job in the war has highlighted the underlying weaknesses of their strategy and their military capabilities.
It’s also worth noting that the constant use of the word “war” as a means of manipulation is an old tactic. It’s a way to justify actions, rally support, and control the narrative. The only problem is that it doesn’t work forever.
Ultimately, we’re left with a sense of weariness. These pronouncements have lost their power. Instead of being alarmed, many people are just waiting for it to end. The rhetoric, in essence, has become meaningless.