By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In August 2025, the rate of Russian territorial gains in Ukraine decreased by 18%, with 464 square kilometers seized, bringing the total occupied area to 19% of Ukraine. This mirrors the percentage held on October 3, 2022. DeepState attributed the decline in activity to the rotation of Russian units, with assault intensity lower than in the preceding three months due to redeployments and troop rotations. However, analysts predict an increase in Russian activity during September.
Read the original article here
Russian occupation pace fell by almost 20% in August, and honestly, it’s a development that deserves some serious unpacking. Considering the overall situation, this decrease isn’t just a blip on the radar; it’s a potential indicator of a significant shift in the conflict. For a while, it looked as though Russia was steadily expanding its control, albeit slowly, across Ukrainian territory. To see that pace slow down, and seemingly reverse in some areas, is definitely noteworthy.
The data points towards something more complex than just the front lines on a map. For nearly three years, the increase in occupied territory has been negligible, effectively zero. Think about that. Almost three years of conflict, and the needle barely moves. It makes you wonder about the true nature of the conflict and what Russia’s ultimate objectives are. The “so anticipated summer invasion,” as it was put, seems to have completely flopped, which no journalist seem to be mentioning.
Instead of focusing purely on territory, it seems we need to look at this from a different angle: political control. The entire war, it appears, is not about moving lines but establishing control. If that’s the case, then the slowdown in territorial gains speaks volumes. It suggests Russia is struggling to achieve its primary goal, whatever that may be, by employing its current approach. And we’re not going to mention the whole goblin and taco comments, the internet is a weird place.
Ukraine, on the other hand, appears to be playing a very different game: a war of attrition, and it would seem, they are winning. This is a strategy that focuses on wearing down the opponent’s resources and will to fight. Russia has depleted its reserves, with the loss of APCs, tanks, soldiers, and now fuel. This is significant because it demonstrates that Ukraine is not just holding its own; it’s actively undermining Russia’s ability to continue the war, all the while focusing on destroying their military factories.
Additionally, the attacks on aircraft, seacraft, and factories are strategic plays. By targeting key military assets, Ukraine is further limiting Russia’s ability to conduct offensive operations and sustain its military machine. Now, there’s even the suggestion that Russia is currently controlling less territory than it did at the beginning of the war. That’s a pretty substantial reversal if true. This is the point that it is crucial to look at the source, but the implications are significant.
The evidence, even if anecdotal in some cases, paints a picture of a changing dynamic on the ground. Ukraine seems to be effectively counter-offensive, pushing Russian forces back in most situations over the last few months. That, plus the slowdown in occupation pace, signals that the tide might be turning.
While it’s important to avoid overstating the situation, we can all agree, it is quite extraordinary that Russia is trying to take back cities they already controlled previously. The whole situation is, as the saying goes, a mess. But ultimately the idea that Russia now controls less territory than they did in the early days of the war is a staggering observation, even if the numbers aren’t 100% certain.
In the end, it’s a fluid situation, and the story is still developing. However, the trend toward slowing Russian occupation, coupled with successful Ukrainian counteroffensives, suggests that we may be witnessing a critical turning point in this war.