By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On Friday, Estonia reported a violation of its airspace by three Russian MiG-31 fighter jets, remaining for 12 minutes over the Gulf of Finland without permission. NATO swiftly responded, intercepting the aircraft, and the EU condemned the incident as an “extremely dangerous provocation” and a sign of escalating tensions, with the EU proposing new sanctions against Russia. The incident follows previous airspace violations by Russian aircraft in Poland and Romania, prompting calls for increased political and economic pressure on Moscow and pledges to bolster defenses along NATO’s eastern flank.
Read the original article here
Estonia says its airspace was violated by three Russian jets, a situation that is, sadly, becoming almost commonplace in certain regions. The repeated instances of incursions into NATO and EU airspace raise serious questions about the strategies being employed and the potential consequences if these incidents are left unchecked. The frequency of these events, coupled with the apparent lack of decisive response, is prompting discussions about how to effectively deter such behavior, particularly from a country like Russia.
Estonia says its airspace was violated by three Russian jets, and one can’t help but wonder if this is part of a larger strategy. Some believe that this is Russia testing the boundaries of what it can get away with, pushing the limits of international norms and the resolve of NATO. There’s a sense that a strong, decisive response is needed, possibly including using force to defend territorial integrity, which some believe is the only language that truly resonates with Putin. The cautious approach, the thinking goes, might signal weakness and encourage further aggression.
Estonia says its airspace was violated by three Russian jets, echoing a sentiment of frustration and a desire for more robust defense. It is argued that the current responses, which often involve diplomatic pressure and economic sanctions, are insufficient. Instead, the suggestion is that the response should be swift and decisive, perhaps even by shooting down violating aircraft. Some people bring up Turkey as a model for more aggressive defensive actions. The absence of a strong, visible response is viewed as a sign of weakness and allows the other side to push further.
Estonia says its airspace was violated by three Russian jets, highlighting a growing fear that these events are part of a “salami-slicing” strategy. This is where the aggressor slowly nibbles away at the defender’s territory or security, creating a situation where they can establish a permanent advantage. This method aims to slowly erode warning systems. The argument is that repeated incursions undermine the rule of law and put sovereignty and equal security for all member states at risk.
Estonia says its airspace was violated by three Russian jets, and this calls into question the concept of inconsistency in the response. The discussion of how one region, such as the Nordics, experiences such violations while others in Europe are not subjected to the same threats, this is a problem. If some borders are better protected than others, it sends a message to adversaries that they can apply pressure selectively.
Estonia says its airspace was violated by three Russian jets, and the call for decisive action and military responses is a frequent theme. The idea that airspace violations should be met with an immediate and proportional military response, such as shooting down the offending aircraft, is being discussed. In this view, any action should be taken against *all* tactics and strategies equally. This perspective also suggests that if these violations persist, they could aid Russia in attacking Ukraine.
Estonia says its airspace was violated by three Russian jets, and the potential repercussions of the situation are a concern, leading to the idea that if something isn’t done, tragedy could occur. This is not something to be taken lightly. The sentiment is that NATO may need to drastically change its approach, including updating its airspace defense posture and implementing these changes rigorously. Some believe that the only way to stop this is to take some of these aircraft down.
Estonia says its airspace was violated by three Russian jets, and the notion of what can be done to protect the territory arises, with a strong emphasis on decisive action. There is the belief that waiting and hoping for the problem to disappear is not a good strategy.
Estonia says its airspace was violated by three Russian jets, and the discussion goes into the accuracy of aircraft pilots in their position in the air. It’s asked if they are clearly aware of their position, even to the meter, and know they are breaking the rules. There is some discussion on the concept of an air of provocation. Many feel that breaching airspace is not an act of war. It is *what is done* when breaching the airspace that has to be handled with careful thought.