By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent radio interview, Russia’s ambassador to France, Alexei Meshkov, stated that downing any Russian aircraft would be considered an act of war, regardless of airspace violations. This statement follows growing accusations from European nations regarding breaches of their airspace by Russian planes and drones. Meshkov also claimed that Russia does not shoot down aircraft that infringe on its airspace and asserted that the West has not provided evidence of the alleged violations, even though such incidents have occurred. These comments come amidst a backdrop of heightened tensions, with examples of similar acts happening in the past.
Read the original article here
Moscow Warns: Downing Russian Planes Would Mean War, Violations or Not — The Kremlin has contradicted recent accusations that Russian jets intentionally violated NATO airspace – an incident that Europe says has become a recurring pattern.
Let’s unpack this whole situation, shall we? The core of the issue is pretty clear: Russia, according to various accusations, has been sending its aircraft into NATO airspace. Now, Moscow is saying, essentially, “we didn’t do it,” but also, “if you *do* shoot us down, even if we *are* violating your airspace, that means war.” It’s a tangled web, a diplomatic knot that’s more likely to cause friction than find a solution. The message seems to be, “We’re at war with NATO”.
So, what’s really going on here? It seems like Moscow is trying to play a game of chicken, probing at the edges, testing the waters. They appear to be violating airspace with little regard to consequences. The risk Russia is taking is enormous. The potential payoff is dubious at best. It’s a dangerous game, where miscalculations can quickly escalate into something far more serious.
The situation boils down to a pretty simple equation: Russia violates the airspace of a military alliance, and the alliance is considering defending itself. Russia seems to be suggesting that a defensive act constitutes aggression. Moscow has, in essence, admitted the intention to violate airspace and seems perfectly willing to start a war with the rest of the world.
The whole thing is frankly exhausting, isn’t it? It’s like dealing with a bully who keeps poking you, daring you to fight. And the thing is, Russia is already struggling in Ukraine. It’s hard to see how a confrontation with NATO could possibly go well for them. The world is not afraid of Russia’s threats.
Then we get to the core of the issue. If Russian aircraft are shot down, it’s an act of war. It’s a ridiculous position, really. It’s like saying, “We’re going to trespass on your property, and if you try to stop us, we’re going to attack you.” What could be more absurd?
The key here seems to be a strategy of escalating tension, constantly ratcheting up the rhetoric, as if to intimidate opponents into backing down. But this kind of brinkmanship can lead to disasters. If the goal is to provoke a reaction, then the whole situation is a mistake.
Why engage in this stupid conversation with Russia? The question is not whether Russia violates NATO airspace, but whether NATO will allow Russia to continually violate its airspace. The world can see how Russia conducts war. It’s hardly a threat. What’s especially frustrating is the blatant disregard for international norms. It’s a reminder that these threats can be empty and that Russia may be weaker than it appears. The constant violations of airspace are a sign of weakness, not strength.
The problem is, if Russia’s actions go unchecked, it creates a dangerous precedent. It’s a clear signal that Moscow thinks it can get away with anything. It might be time to call their bluff. It’s a simple solution: Russia should stop flying its planes into NATO airspace. It would be a start, anyway.
Now, the question of whether these airspace violations are intentional or accidental is open to debate. Are the pilots incompetent, or is this part of a calculated strategy? One way or the other, the situation is being used to escalate tensions.
If Russia is caught violating NATO airspace, the response must be decisive. And Russia is admitting that it intends to try again. Any aircraft entering NATO airspace must be handled as a violation of sovereignty. This is not how the world works.
It’s time for NATO to stand its ground, and for the rest of the world to do the same. It’s a dangerous world, and the constant threats are not helping. Russia, you’ve already said you’re at war with NATO. It’s time to act accordingly.