By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the assassination of Charlie Kirk, political figures made claims about the prevalence of left-wing political violence in the U.S. However, research reveals that these assertions lack factual basis. Studies and data indicate that the majority of domestic terrorism incidents and fatalities are linked to right-wing extremism, not left-wing groups. Despite the challenges in defining and quantifying political violence, the evidence consistently points to a higher frequency and lethality of right-wing extremist acts compared to those of the left.
Read the original article here
Right-wing extremist violence is more frequent and more deadly, a reality that should be considered a statistical fact, yet often gets distorted or dismissed in the political discourse. The numbers speak for themselves: since 2001, right-wing violence has accounted for the vast majority – over 75% – of domestic terrorism deaths in the United States. This isn’t a matter of opinion or a liberal talking point; it’s an objective truth backed by data, and ignoring it only makes us less safe. The data, including the Oklahoma City bombing (1995) – which would be included in the stats if the timeframe started in 1991 instead of 2001 – paints a clear picture.
Right-wing violence is, tragically, an enduring presence in American history, and there’s a strong argument that the percentage may even be higher than reported. The actual figure is closer to 85% or even higher, with the potential for this number to be even higher due to how other violent acts get categorized. The narrative that “both sides” are equally extreme is simply false and a deflection tactic employed by those wishing to downplay the severity and frequency of right-wing violence.
This isn’t just about isolated incidents; it’s a pattern. The right-wing extremist ideology provides the fuel for numerous acts of violence, including those carried out by hate groups and individuals motivated by racial hatred, anti-government sentiments, or religious fanaticism. The fact that this information is often omitted or downplayed is alarming. The removal of reports by the Department of Justice under the Trump administration, which highlighted the prevalence of right-wing extremism, is a clear indication of how some are trying to bury the truth. This isn’t about political correctness; it’s about acknowledging the reality of a dangerous threat to our country and people’s safety.
The effort to rebrand certain groups as something they are not is a deliberate tactic to cloud the issue. There is a consistent denial or attempts to deflect away from right-wing extremism. The use of labels and classifications can be very misleading, and it is important to understand how data is collected and categorized so the information does not skew the actual situation.
The motivations of right-wing extremists are varied but frequently include white supremacy, anti-immigrant sentiments, and religious fundamentalism. This often manifests in the targeting of minority groups, religious communities, and anyone perceived as “other.” It’s a reflection of a dangerous ideology that promotes fear and violence and, frankly, makes America less safe.
The fact that this data is often misrepresented or ignored is troubling. There is a disturbing trend of dismissing the problem or blaming other groups. This is, unfortunately, a disingenuous tactic and only serves to protect those who espouse violent views and incite violent acts.
The “both sides” narrative is often a convenient tool to deflect blame and to create a false equivalency. This approach ignores the clear statistical reality. We need to have an honest conversation about right-wing extremism, which includes acknowledging its frequency, its motivations, and its devastating consequences.
There’s also a tendency to rebrand right-wing extremists as “lone wolves” or individuals acting independently. While some attacks are perpetrated by individuals, the underlying ideology and online networks that fuel their actions cannot be ignored. These individuals are often influenced by extremist ideologies that are readily available online, and often receive encouragement or support from various groups or organizations.
The reality is that right-wing extremism poses a significant and ongoing threat to the safety and security of the United States. It’s a threat that requires a comprehensive response, including law enforcement action, public education, and a concerted effort to counter the spread of extremist ideologies.
The solution isn’t complex. Accurate reporting, honest dialogue, and a willingness to confront the truth are necessary steps. To deny or minimize this problem is to put our collective safety at risk. It is crucial to acknowledge the threat of right-wing extremism. Only then can we begin to combat it effectively.