By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A newly released scrapbook from Jeffrey Epstein’s 50th birthday includes a photo of Epstein holding a novelty check signed by Donald Trump, accompanied by a note suggesting Epstein “sold” Trump a woman. The woman’s face in the photo is redacted, but the caption, allegedly from Joel Pashcow, implies a transaction for $22,500. The woman’s lawyer denied any relationship with either Epstein or Trump, denouncing the note as a hoax. This revelation comes as Democrats on the House oversight committee have begun sharing details from the birthday book, compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell.
Read the original article here
The photo of a novelty check, seemingly linking Epstein to a transaction involving Donald Trump and a woman for $22,500, has sparked a firestorm. It’s hard not to be taken aback by the implications, especially when considering the known context of Epstein’s sex trafficking crimes and Trump’s association with him. The idea of this check, a seemingly casual piece of memorabilia, suggests a deeply disturbing narrative of exploitation and the alleged commodification of women.
If the check is genuine, the insensitivity is almost unbearable. It seems they were gleefully commemorating some event, some exchange involving a woman, a human being, and reducing her to a monetary value. This check, meant to be a “joke,” becomes a stark reminder of the power dynamics and the potential for exploitation that existed within their social circle. It’s difficult to comprehend the mindset of those involved, treating such a transaction as a casual matter worthy of a keepsake.
The immediate reaction is one of disgust. The lack of empathy is astounding. The check, if real, unveils an ugly truth about their values and morals. It’s easy to imagine the outrage if this were a political opponent. The hypocrisy is glaring, and the idea that some people would defend this, would downplay the significance of this, is truly disheartening.
The responses on the conservative side of things are worth noting. The fact that some would deny Epstein’s crimes, downplaying the entire situation, is a testament to the blind allegiance some people have. The unwillingness to acknowledge the gravity of the situation, the attempt to distract with other narratives, paints a concerning picture of how far some are willing to go to protect their chosen figures.
Furthermore, it’s the implications and the unanswered questions that hang heavy in the air. The alleged “transaction” begs the question of the identity of the woman, and what role she played in this twisted arrangement. It invites the disturbing thought that this wasn’t an isolated incident, but rather, a glimpse into a pattern of behavior.
The very existence of the check, and the accompanying note, suggests this was something special to them. This event was important enough that they wanted to document it. The notion that this was just some “locker room talk” is insulting. The audacity of it all is breathtaking.
It’s also important to note that the woman in the photo has denied any romantic involvement with either Epstein or Trump, dismissing it as a hoax. This denial only adds another layer of complexity and intrigue. If she wasn’t involved, who was? Did she know about this photo, or was she completely unaware that she was, in some way, at the center of this exchange?
The details are chilling. The check, the language used, the whole scenario speaks volumes about the degradation of human life. It is a grim illustration of how power can be wielded with little regard for ethics or decency. This is, quite frankly, revolting.
The fact that this alleged exchange happened at all, whether the check is authentic or not, underscores the potential for exploitation and the lengths to which those in power might go. The existence of this photo calls for investigation. The public deserves answers.
The possibility that this could be the first of many similar transactions is extremely frightening. The idea that this behavior was not only tolerated but celebrated, is beyond comprehension. The whole situation demands a thorough and objective investigation.