By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A Costa Mesa woman, Laura Lee Yourex, has been charged with five felonies by the U.S. Department of Justice for illegally registering her dog, Maya, to vote in California elections in 2021 and 2022. The dog’s vote was counted in the 2021 gubernatorial recall election but was rejected in the 2022 primary. Prosecutors uncovered social media posts featuring the dog with an “I voted” sticker and ballot, along with Yourex’s self-reporting of the actions to the Orange County Registrar of Voters. The charges include perjury, procuring a false document, registering a non-existent person, and casting a ballot when not entitled to vote, with a minimum of six years in prison if convicted.
Read the original article here
Orange County woman charged for illegally registering dog to vote in 2021, 2022 elections – sounds like something you’d only read in a headline, right? Well, let’s dive into this story, because it’s more than just a quirky news blurb.
So, an Orange County woman decided it was a good idea to register her dog to vote. And not just register, but *illegally* register. Apparently, this wasn’t a secret operation, either. The woman, in a move that’s as baffling as it is brazen, happily shared photos of Maya, the canine voter, sporting an “I Voted” sticker and posing with a ballot on social media. The kicker? Maya passed away. Yet, she was *still* getting ballots. You can imagine the reactions to this, ranging from utter disbelief to a sort of morbid amusement.
The political overtones of this case, as you might expect, have been a significant aspect of the discussion. Based on the comments, there’s a prevailing sense that this sort of behavior aligns with a specific political leaning. Many people instantly assumed the woman’s political affiliations, and, as the comments and the overall tone of the discussion suggests, the assumption leans heavily towards a particular party. This immediate assumption, along with the location in Orange County, paints a pretty clear picture.
Now, some people rightly bring up that this is illegal. It’s not just a matter of getting caught; it’s a fundamental breach of the election process. And this woman isn’t the only one. Voter fraud is a serious issue, regardless of who’s doing it. This, however, seems to be a case of someone attempting to prove a point – perhaps about voter fraud – while simultaneously committing it. The irony of this is absolutely lost on the accused.
There’s also a recognition that requiring proof of residence or identification is common practice. While this does have some support, other people point out the impact that strict voter ID requirements can have on various groups of people. These rules can disproportionately affect those with fewer resources, such as the homeless population, who might not have a permanent address.
Of course, the specifics of the case – the details of the investigation, what charges the woman is facing, and what she hoped to achieve – are all yet to be fleshed out fully in the news. But the initial details, the fact that she confessed, and the social media posts have already provided the public with what it needed to fill in the blanks.
Interestingly, the discussion also touches on the practicalities of voting and how the systems work. It makes you wonder, what exactly are the requirements? What is the process? As the article suggests, there are specific rules for federal elections, and perhaps slightly different ones at the state level. It appears this woman’s scheme was, at least initially, successful, but these attempts to illegally register her dog were ultimately rejected by the system.
Overall, the Orange County woman’s case serves as a fascinating, albeit unsettling, case study in a political climate. It underscores the passion and, at times, the absurdity of the American political landscape. In this case, a woman’s quest, no matter how misguided, to prove a point, has landed her in legal trouble. And yes, it is almost certainly, as the comments indicate, a story that’s guaranteed to get people talking.