Following reports of policy-induced chaos within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Secretary Kristi Noem reportedly berated officials and used profanity. These issues stemmed from Noem’s decision to personally approve all payments over $100,000, leading to significant delays in crucial aid, as well as lapses in essential contracts. Reportedly, Noem and her de facto chief of staff, Corey Lewandowski, displayed disrespectful behavior toward DHS staff, with Lewandowski taking a heavy hand in contract management and personnel decisions. Multiple sources confirm the culture at DHS is in turmoil, with the White House expressing concerns about their management style.
Read the original article here
ICE Barbie Dropped F-Bombs on ‘Screaming’ Call With DHS Officials After Embarrassing Stories is a headline that immediately grabs attention, and frankly, paints a vivid picture. The core of the issue revolves around Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s reaction to some pretty unflattering news stories. The reports apparently revealed the chaos that had been brought about by her policies, specifically her directive requiring personal sign-off on payments exceeding $100,000, which had previously been set at a much higher threshold. This change led to significant delays and bottlenecks within the agencies she oversees.
Now, the fallout. According to the reports, the Secretary didn’t take the criticism well. Instead of the usual response of trying to fix the problem or even, perhaps, stepping down, Noem reportedly unleashed a torrent of profanity during a call with DHS officials. Multiple “f-bombs,” the story goes, were dropped. This wasn’t just a casual conversation; it was described as a “screaming” call.
The reaction to the story online is what one might expect. There’s a general sense of disbelief and outrage directed towards the Secretary, and the overall sentiment is very negative. The focus quickly shifts from the specific policy issue to the character of the person involved. Some are questioning her ability to lead and suggesting she’s unfit for the role. The discussion dives into the physical appearance of the Secretary, which is, well, a digression, and people appear to take it as a sign of her shallowness.
The nickname “ICE Barbie” has been used, and this is a point of some debate, especially since it seems to trivializing the real issues and taking away from the true problem. Some people feel it’s an inappropriate comparison that might even be seen as flattering to the person in question. There is a better nickname, they say, “ICE Cave Troll” is much more accurate.
This behavior is seen as a sign of incompetence and unprofessionalism. It’s a situation where the person in charge is not only facing criticism but is also responding in a way that exacerbates the problem. Instead of addressing the systemic issues, the focus is on the dramatic, and the angry and impulsive actions. The fact that she screamed obscenities does not help her case and is considered an example of how she, allegedly, has lost control.
One specific consequence of Noem’s policy is highlighted: the delayed response of FEMA’s Search and Rescue teams to the Texas flash floods. The implication is that her actions directly hindered the agency’s ability to respond effectively during a crisis, and that the Mexican teams had already arrived on the ground a day earlier. This adds a layer of real-world impact to the story, moving it beyond just a display of temper.
There are other rumors circulating, including one about a possible affair between the Secretary and Corey Lewandowski, which is portrayed as the “worst-kept secret in DC.” This adds a layer of speculation and gossip to the already messy situation. There is mention that Lewandowski wanted to be Noem’s chief of staff, but this was reportedly blocked for various reasons.
Ultimately, the story is a reflection on a perceived lack of professionalism within the administration. It is seen as a failure of leadership. The general feeling is that the behaviors detailed are unacceptable for someone in a position of power and responsibility. The whole situation is described as a disaster, where the actions of the Secretary are seen as deeply troubling, and the entire situation is viewed with a sense of bewilderment.
