By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Downing Street strongly criticized Elon Musk for using “dangerous and inflammatory” language during a London protest, where he stated “violence is coming.” The Prime Minister’s official spokesperson condemned the language, which threatened violence and intimidation. Following the event, which saw thousands in attendance and left 26 police officers injured, Labour leader Keir Starmer and other politicians have also addressed the rhetoric and actions. Several politicians, including the Liberal Democrat leader, Ed Davey, are calling for further condemnation and potential sanctions against Musk for his comments.
Read the original article here
No 10 condemns language used by Elon Musk at far-right UK rally as ‘dangerous’. This is where we’re starting. The Prime Minister’s Office, for those of us who aren’t familiar, has come out swinging, calling the language used by Elon Musk at a recent far-right rally in London “dangerous and inflammatory.” It seems the words “violence is coming” and “you either fight back or you die” didn’t exactly sit well with the folks at Number 10. And honestly, can you blame them? Those phrases aren’t exactly conducive to a calm, measured political discourse.
The reactions to Musk’s words are understandably varied, with some people sounding the alarm bells and others seemingly unconcerned. The sentiment appears to be that this sort of rhetoric could be interpreted as encouraging, or at the very least, hinting at, the possibility of violent regime change. The worry is palpable, as if we’re witnessing the opening moves of something far more unsettling. There’s talk of parallels to figures like Donald Trump and the January 6th events, suggesting that this is more than just a careless slip of the tongue.
The concerns extend beyond just the immediate phrases used. There’s a sense that Musk’s underlying agenda is the real issue. The critique points towards deregulation, the pursuit of “freedom” to amass wealth and the dismantling of established structures. It’s as if Musk’s words are merely a smokescreen, covering the true goals of his actions. There is a growing feeling that he wants to push his agenda, and what he said is an effort to do that.
There are calls for action that go beyond simple condemnation. Some people are even suggesting a boycott of Musk’s businesses, such as Tesla and Twitter. There are strong opinions that he shouldn’t be allowed to enter the country, and that there should be more than just words from the PM. Some believe the lack of response is a way of letting the right take over and take control, and that a more forceful response is necessary.
Comparing this to past events, like the arrest of Abu Hamza for inciting violence and racial hatred, the argument is that there’s a double standard at play. The focus on Musk feels selective, while the actions of others, particularly those on the far-right, are treated with kid gloves. Is the government really going to do anything, or is this just another case of empty words? The level of action suggested by the PM is a very important question that needs to be answered.
One argument here is that we’re potentially witnessing a power grab, possibly even martial law, being stoked by the elites. The question of whether Musk would even be granted a visa for future visits to the UK is raised, highlighting the potential consequences of his actions. It’s interesting to consider the role of free speech, especially when it comes to incitement to violence. Where does it start and end?
It’s worth remembering that free speech in the UK is not unlimited, but curtailed by laws against inciting violence. The comparisons to Bond villains and dystopian literature are a telling illustration of the mood. This all paints a picture of a man who is using his words to rile people up.
There’s a sense of frustration and anger towards the current government, with calls for change. The sentiment is that the current government isn’t acting effectively or doing enough.
The final question is what the UK will do about the situation, and the assumption is that nothing of consequence will come from No. 10’s words. This also makes you wonder, what will they do? Words from Number 10 aren’t doing the job and more actions are needed.