By John Q. Hosedrinker 
California Governor Gavin Newsom recently expressed concern about the possibility of the U.S. not holding a presidential election in 2028, alleging that efforts by former President Donald Trump to influence redistricting in Republican-led states could undermine the democratic process. In response, Newsom signed a bill proposing a special election in California to allow lawmakers to temporarily control the drawing of congressional maps, a move intended to favor Democrats and counter perceived partisan gerrymandering. This proposal, known as the Election Rigging Response Act, has sparked controversy, with opponents arguing it constitutes gerrymandering itself, while supporters claim it is a necessary measure to protect voters. The proposal faces opposition from various groups, including former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and the California Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.
Read the original article here
Gov. Gavin Newsom’s expressed fear about the possibility of the 2028 election not happening has clearly struck a chord, and it’s understandable why. The core of the concern revolves around a potential undermining of the democratic process, a fear that is not new, but seems to be gathering momentum. The general sentiment is that even if an election *does* occur, it might be manipulated, rigged, or rendered fundamentally unfair. This isn’t just a fear of losing an election; it’s a worry that the very foundations of democracy are being threatened.
The concern is amplified by the perceived actions and intentions of certain political figures, particularly those aligned with former President Trump. There’s a strong sense that certain political forces are actively seeking to bypass, circumvent, or outright end democracy. The methods anticipated are numerous, ranging from making voting harder, to using crises to postpone or cancel elections. There’s the suggestion of a war or emergency being manufactured to justify the postponement, or worse, the cancellation, of the 2028 election. The possible use of martial law is floated, with the Supreme Court’s potential role, and its alignment with certain parties, in enabling such moves.
Many of these observations touch upon potential methods of subverting the democratic process. There’s worry about increased monitoring by authorities, restrictive voting regulations, and a shift to in-person voting to limit participation. Concerns about election tampering, and the overall lack of a “free and fair” election are expressed. The potential for the election committee to be compromised, with support from across all branches of government, is another prominent point of concern. This paints a picture of a concerted effort to control the outcome, or even prevent it altogether.
Another element influencing the perception of what may or may not occur in 2028 centers on the physical well-being and potential of key players. The age and health of certain individuals, specifically Trump, are mentioned frequently. The notion is that his health issues might prevent him from executing an authoritarian power grab, or that he might not even survive until then. This could open the door to an alternate set of events, like a transition of power before the 2028 election, which creates its own set of concerns.
The discussion underscores the importance of the upcoming midterm elections and the need to be vigilant. Several commentors believe that these midterms could be a critical test. If the party in power loses, the path to power and control is less secure, but even still, it is thought Trump has started messing with the process in the coming years. The potential for a “war” or “emergency” created by radical leftist “crime” in the cities is one scenario.
The worries aren’t isolated to the potential for manipulation. There’s a broader concern about the health of the republic. The discussion touches on the current political landscape, and the anger and discontent of the American people. The economy’s potential future, and the resulting civil unrest, is a point of focus, which in turn could be used as a justification for martial law. This reinforces the apprehension that the 2028 election might not happen in a legitimate manner. It is, as some note, a clear sign of fascism brewing right now.
A related anxiety, is how to prevent the feared scenario. Many are asking, “So what’s the plan?” While some are hopeful that people will “wake up” and take action, the general sentiment is that something more is needed. It’s clear that the fear of a compromised or nonexistent 2028 election isn’t just a fear of who will win, but a fear of losing the ability to decide.