By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A federal indictment has charged former New York financier Howard Rubin and his personal assistant, Jennifer Powers, with operating a sex trafficking ring involving severe violence and lasting injuries to multiple women. The indictment alleges Rubin recruited women for commercial sex acts involving BDSM, exceeding the boundaries of their consent. Powers facilitated the encounters by arranging travel, accommodations, and purchasing BDSM equipment, using Rubin’s funds, which also covered her personal expenses. Rubin is accused of brutalizing the women, leading to physical and psychological harm, while both Rubin and Powers face serious charges, including sex trafficking, and the possibility of a life sentence.
Read the original article here
New York financier Howard Rubin and ex-assistant charged with running violent sex trafficking ring, a story that’s hitting hard. It’s honestly shocking, but at the same time, does it really surprise anyone anymore? The comments I’ve been reading are echoing a lot of the same sentiments: disgust, anger, and a deep sense of “here we go again.” It’s almost like a macabre replay of a familiar narrative.
The details emerging from the indictment are chilling. It wasn’t just about hiring sex workers; it was about abuse, manipulation, and a complete disregard for the women involved. The alleged actions of Howard Rubin and his assistant, identified as Powers, paint a disturbing picture of power dynamics gone horribly wrong. Rubin, the wealthy financier, allegedly used his position to exploit and harm these women, while Powers, according to the indictment, was instrumental in enabling the abuse and managing the fallout. The accounts of the injuries and Powers’ response, minimizing and dismissing the women’s experiences, are particularly disturbing.
The scale of the operation seems to be focused around Rubin and his assistant, hiring and abusing women. But honestly, the legal definition of a “sex trafficking ring” feels somewhat different from the reality. The lack of a client list – which was anticipated in some initial comments – doesn’t change the severity of the crimes. The fact that it’s *just* them, doesn’t make the actions any less heinous. The allegations still depict a pattern of predatory behavior and exploitation, focusing on the abuse of power.
The responses I’m seeing are laced with a sense of deep frustration. The recurring question is, “What is wrong with these people?” It’s a question born from a sense of betrayal. Wealth and privilege, in this narrative, are not just resources but tools used to inflict harm. This fuels the suspicion that these are not isolated incidents, but rather symptomatic of a wider problem. The fact that this all happened in New York, a city often associated with wealth and power, amplifies that feeling.
The comments about ties to Trump are perhaps the most politically charged. The suggestion of a possible pardon feels almost inevitable, given past behavior. The implication, whether explicitly stated or not, is that the wealthy and well-connected often operate above the law, especially when they’re perceived as belonging to a certain political circle. The very thought raises questions about the fairness of the justice system, if someone with connections and money would walk free.
The visual descriptions of Rubin and the comments focusing on appearance, such as “moldy face” and “skin suit,” reflect a palpable disgust. It’s almost as if the physical appearance is a reflection of the corruption within. The phrase “no souls behind those fucking eyes” speaks volumes about the perceived moral emptiness of the accused. It’s a visceral reaction, driven by a sense of revulsion and a deep-seated feeling that something fundamental has been violated.
The comparison to Jeffrey Epstein is inevitable and powerful. The implication is that Rubin is not an anomaly but part of a larger network, and that the actions of Epstein and Rubin are connected. There are echoes of the same patterns of exploitation, the same abuse of power, the same sense of impunity. And then there are the “Epstein files” – The need for transparency, the demand for accountability. The comments point to a growing skepticism towards the wealthy, a lack of trust in institutions, and a yearning for justice that, in the face of such allegations, can seem hard to achieve.
The responses suggest a broader questioning of the very nature of wealth and power. There’s a sense that the pursuit of money, particularly when it reaches a certain level, can become detached from any moral constraints. The question “What’s the point of being rich and powerful if they won’t let you run a sex trafficking ring?” – posed ironically, points to a deeply cynical view of those in positions of power. It highlights the potential for corruption and the ease with which power can be abused.
The overall tone is one of outrage, suspicion, and a resigned sense of “here we go again.” It’s a narrative of betrayal, where the wealthy are not just seen as privileged but as predators, and where the system seems to be rigged in their favor. The demand for accountability, the calls for transparency, and the sheer disgust all point to a society wrestling with its own demons.