By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In Nepal, Gen Z protesters stormed Parliament and set fire to a building just before Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli resigned. Demonstrations, sparked by a social media ban, led to the burning of Oli’s residence and the Singha Durbar premises, along with the deaths of nineteen people, and over 300 injured. Flights at Tribhuvan International Airport were canceled due to security concerns amid escalating violence, which also led to the vandalism of the Nepali Congress central office. Authorities imposed curfews and the India-Nepal border was placed on alert due to the unrest.
Read the original article here
Nepal Parliament breached, a building set on fire, and reports are coming in of widespread unrest. This situation, particularly concerning because of the involvement of Gen Z protesters, is rapidly evolving and raises serious questions about the country’s political stability. The accounts coming out of Nepal paint a grim picture: claims of violence, including reports of fatalities, and a deep-seated anger fueled by decades of perceived corruption within the government.
The use of the term “Gen Z protesters” is a point of some debate. While younger generations appear to be at the forefront of these demonstrations, with social media providing a platform for organization and mobilization, the situation has reportedly become more complex. Some accounts suggest that the initial protests, which may have begun with the Gen Z demographic, have been overtaken by other groups with potentially different agendas. It’s important to note that this is one of the major considerations for this article: that the situation in Nepal is a fluid one.
The protests, sparked by the government’s perceived failure to address corruption, escalated after the alleged use of excessive force by police, leading to fatalities, including reports of school kids dying with headshots. The response from authorities, coupled with a recent incident involving a minister and a young girl, has only intensified the public’s outrage. It’s easy to see how such a combination would lead to the current state of affairs.
There are also reports of significant unrest and chaos unfolding, with accusations of widespread looting and the destruction of public property. Some sources suggest the government has lost control, making the situation even more volatile. The former Prime Minister, who has a controversial past, is rumored to be employing his own means to drive the chaos, and the burning of government offices and courts further underscores the depth of the turmoil.
Observers have noted similarities between the events in Nepal and other countries in the region, like Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Many question if there’s some sort of a conspiracy being plotted by foreign powers. The common thread seems to be deep-rooted discontent and a desire for change, often fueled by grievances over corruption, lack of opportunity, and government overreach.
The question of censorship is an obvious one. The shutting down of social media and reports of the death of a US Special Forces Command member in neighboring Bangladesh have added to the sense of unease and the belief that something more sinister is at play. Many see a coordinated effort to suppress dissent, echoing concerns about rising global authoritarianism and the erosion of free speech.
The situation in Nepal is complex, with a variety of forces at play. It appears that a combination of deep-seated frustration over corruption and recent events has ignited widespread protests, with the involvement of Gen Z. The future remains uncertain, but the intensity of the unrest and the potential for further escalation suggest a difficult path ahead for the country.