By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In 2019, during a classified mission approved by President Trump, US Navy SEALs attempted to plant a listening device in North Korea amidst nuclear negotiations. The operation, conducted by SEAL Team 6, went awry when the team encountered a North Korean fishing boat and opened fire, resulting in the deaths of all on board. Following the incident, the SEALs disposed of the bodies, and the mission was aborted. Despite internal reviews, the operation remained undisclosed and was deemed justifiable, with no notification given to key members of Congress.
Read the original article here
US Navy SEALs “Slaughtered” Civilians During Botched 2019 North Korea Mission is the core issue here, and it paints a grim picture. It’s hard to ignore the initial shock of the words used: “slaughtered.” It immediately brings up images of unnecessary brutality. The details that follow, particularly the alleged actions of the SEALs – pulling bodies from a boat, puncturing lungs to make them sink, and discarding the dead – are absolutely horrifying. Whether the word “slaughtered” is used or not, what allegedly happened goes far beyond a military operation gone wrong.
The scale of the tragedy becomes clearer with more details emerging. The casual description of “a number of civilians” being killed, followed by the uncertain “two… or three” bodies recovered, is chilling. It reads like someone, perhaps trying to minimize the event, offering clumsy, evasive answers. The downplaying of the severity, as if the lives lost were almost an afterthought, is unsettling. It doesn’t matter if there were a few civilians or many, the unnecessary deaths of innocent lives is a travesty.
The alleged involvement of the U.S. military is deeply troubling. The suggestion that the North Korean civilians were mistakenly killed, possibly to cover up an operation that had gone awry, raises serious questions. Were the people killed mistaken for North Korean troops? Did it truly matter in that moment? The lack of accountability, the seeming disregard for human life, and the attempt to conceal what happened are all deeply problematic. The accusations made by Trump also have to be looked into.
The context in which this alleged event occurred is crucial. North Korea, a country with a notoriously repressive regime, provides a backdrop of political tension. What was the actual mission? Was there proper authorization? Did the SEALs stray from their orders? These details are essential to understanding what happened. It also brings up the question of whether or not Trump knew about it.
It’s important to note the possible attempts to cover up the events. The alleged decision to dispose of the bodies and the seemingly vague answers given about the number of casualties suggest an effort to hide the truth. If accurate, these actions point towards a culture of secrecy and a willingness to evade responsibility. The fact that this story is coming out years after it occurred adds more questions to the investigation.
The reaction of the public to the events are important. A tragic event such as the alleged actions in North Korea would likely lead to strong reactions. Some might express outrage, calling for accountability and justice. Others might feel a sense of betrayal, disappointed that the actions are those committed by their own military. The details matter, as some may wish to use this story to push a narrative, or agenda.
The potential consequences of these actions are significant. The relationship between the U.S. and North Korea could be affected, creating more tension between the two countries. The incident could also lead to changes in military protocols and a review of the use of force in operations.
One point of this whole event is the discussion of black ops. It is important to keep in mind these operations are often carried out in secrecy, and the details can be hard to verify. These operations often face minimal oversight.
The accusations being made need to be taken seriously. These allegations, if true, would represent a grave breach of international law and human rights. A thorough investigation is needed to determine the truth, identify those responsible, and ensure accountability. The impact on both the victims and their families would be immeasurable. The consequences of the event could lead to a wide scale impact, and possibly a global stage.
There are multiple questions that still remain: Why was this happening? Who authorized the mission? Who made the call? What was the goal of this particular mission in the first place? Were there attempts to cover it up, and if so, by whom? What is the full truth? This incident demands further investigation to fully understand the events that transpired. It is more than just a tragic event. It is a story that requires the truth.