By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Following the death of former leader Melissa Hortman, Minnesota House Democrats have selected State Rep. Zack Stephenson to lead the caucus. Stephenson, who was elected in 2018 and previously co-chaired the chamber’s Ways and Means Committee, was chosen by the 66-member DFL caucus in a closed-door meeting, succeeding Hortman who served for eight years. Stephenson, who was mentored by Hortman, will now lead the Democrats at a crucial time, as the legislature prepares for a potential special session and the upcoming 2026 regular session. His selection comes amidst the backdrop of a tied legislature, a special election, and ongoing grief over the loss of their former leader.
Read the original article here
Minnesota House Democrats choose new leader after former Speaker Melissa Hortman killed in political attack.
The tragic death of former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman has left a void in state politics, prompting Democrats to select a new leader to guide them forward. It’s a challenging time for the party, grappling with the loss of a prominent figure while navigating the complex political landscape. What makes this even more difficult to process is the nature of her death: a politically motivated attack. The initial shock and grief are compounded by the realization that this was not a random act but a deliberate attempt to silence a voice and disrupt the democratic process.
The contrast in the reactions following Hortman’s assassination and the death of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk is jarring. While the death of a high-profile political figure like Kirk garnered significant national attention, including flags at half-mast and expressions of mourning from those in power, Hortman’s death, it seems, has been largely relegated to the back pages. This disparity highlights a disturbing trend of selective outrage and a concerning lack of empathy for victims based on their political affiliation. The silence from certain corners of the political spectrum and the media is deafening, leaving many wondering why one tragedy is met with such reverence while another is met with a muted response.
The differing treatment of these two deaths, and specifically the downplaying of Hortman’s assassination by the media, raises serious questions about the media’s role in shaping public perception. The media’s tendency to use euphemisms like “political attack” instead of the more accurate term “assassination” suggests a reluctance to fully acknowledge the gravity of what happened. This cautious language may be a deliberate attempt to avoid alienating certain segments of the population or potentially even a fear of retribution from those who might disagree with the terminology. Whatever the reason, this reluctance undermines the public’s understanding of the events and potentially diminishes the importance of combating the rise in political violence.
The media’s seeming bias is made even more blatant when considering how quickly and emphatically Kirk’s death was labeled an assassination. This difference in treatment sends a clear message, however unintentional, about which lives are deemed worthy of mourning and which are not. The fact that the death of a Democratic Speaker of the House is seemingly treated as less important than that of a conservative commentator is a deeply troubling indicator of how our political discourse has deteriorated. It’s difficult not to see this as a reflection of the deep divisions within our society and the increasingly polarized nature of our politics.
The political landscape in Minnesota and beyond is forever changed by Hortman’s assassination. Her death serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of political extremism and the importance of defending democracy. As Democrats choose their new leader, they face the challenging task of honoring Hortman’s legacy while navigating the complexities of a deeply divided society. The new leader will need to bring the party together, and, ideally, make sure such senseless acts are never repeated again. This means finding a way to bridge the divide, combat the hateful rhetoric that fuels such violence, and work toward a more just and equitable society.