By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Multiple Pentagon leaders, including General Dan Caine, are raising concerns about Pete Hegseth’s plans to overhaul the National Defense Strategy, particularly his proposal to prioritize homeland defense over global security threats from China and reduce U.S. military presence in Europe and Africa. These plans are expected to be discussed at a meeting in Virginia where hundreds of generals and admirals have been summoned. Sources indicate that military officials believe Hegseth’s strategy is shortsighted and potentially irrelevant, especially given concerns about China’s aggression. Furthermore, the former Fox News host is under scrutiny for his management style and the unusual in-person meeting, which has prompted criticism regarding security and practicality from Democratic Senators.
Read the original article here
Top military brass are indeed clashing with Pete Hegseth, and the focus is squarely on his proposed overhaul of the nation’s defense strategy. The discontent is palpable, with leading military figures openly expressing their concerns. The core issue? Hegseth, a former Fox News host, aims to fundamentally reshape how the country views its defense priorities.
Specifically, Hegseth wants to shift the emphasis from global threats, like China, which has been a central focus for years, to prioritizing homeland defense. This is a significant pivot, and one that’s ruffling feathers within the Pentagon. Coupled with this shift, there are plans to potentially reduce the U.S. military presence in both Europe and Africa.
The military chiefs, including figures like Gen. Dan Caine, are reportedly worried about these plans. They see Hegseth’s proposals as lacking foresight and potentially irrelevant, particularly given what they see as an unpredictable approach to foreign policy. Sources suggest that Caine has voiced his objections directly, making it clear that he believes the existing focus on deterring and potentially countering China should remain a priority.
One of the biggest concerns is the potential impact on U.S. alliances, especially in Europe, given the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the continued aggressive actions of Russia. The potential for troop withdrawals is causing further anxiety, leaving allies in the region vulnerable.
Adding to the tension, there are mounting concerns about Hegseth’s leadership style. Reports indicate he’s struggling under the pressure of his role, exhibiting behaviors that are seen as unsettling within the Department of Defense. There are even suggestions of a “manic quality,” and a tendency to be overly preoccupied with his own security.
The situation is further complicated by the unusual meeting Hegseth has called in Virginia, where he is requiring hundreds of generals and admirals to attend in person, which has drawn criticism from several Senators. This meeting, intended to discuss the “warrior ethos” mentality Hegseth wishes to instill, is seen by many as a tone-deaf exercise in optics and control.
The potential for this to become something more is clear, with fears surrounding the military being deployed on domestic soil. There is an evident concern that changes to the department of defense will create a “Department of War,” where it will be turned towards American cities.