By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Epirus’s Leonidas high-power microwave weapon recently underwent a successful live-fire demonstration in Indiana, showcasing its ability to neutralize drone swarms. The latest Leonidas system disabled all 61 drones targeted, including taking down 49 with a single beam. This updated version boasts enhanced range and lethality compared to its predecessors. The demonstration, attended by U.S. and allied representatives, highlighted Leonidas’s capabilities in selectively targeting drones and ensuring safe drone landing zones, solidifying its position as a key counter-swarm solution.
Read the original article here
High-power microwave systems, capable of instantly disabling entire drone swarms, are undeniably captivating. The ability to neutralize 49 drones with a single burst of electromagnetic interference (EMI) is a feat that instantly grabs attention, conjuring images of futuristic warfare. The technology, as it stands, isn’t widely available, and its potential deployment in current conflicts, like the war in Ukraine, remains uncertain, mostly due to its classification. Let’s delve into what this means and what might be done.
One immediate question that springs to mind is the effective range of these microwave systems. Initial indications suggest a range of around 2 kilometers. However, practical battlefield conditions like fog or rain could dramatically reduce this, making them far less effective in adverse weather. This limitation instantly brings up the point that the technology requires very specific circumstances to function optimally, unlike some more established weaponry.
Safety concerns are paramount when considering the use of high-power microwaves. The potential effects on nearby personnel and troops are a valid worry. Though the radiation is non-ionizing, meaning it won’t cause cancer in the traditional sense, exposure could lead to burns, nausea, and pain. Current military radar systems, for example, already pose similar risks, highlighting the need for protective measures.
If these microwave systems cannot be used to protect ground troops from low-flying drones, the system itself becomes vulnerable to destruction. To counter this, the use of Faraday cages, which block electromagnetic fields, offers a potential solution. However, shielding a drone against microwave radiation limits its ability to communicate with a human controller or access GPS signals.
There is a potential challenge involving the drone’s onboard electronics. For example, fiber optic cables, which can be used to send and receive signals wirelessly from the drones, could be fried by the microwaves. Using a Faraday cage, this could be counteracted by using the same principle, except the only option would be fully autonomous AI-controlled drones that are hardened against this tech.
It’s important to consider the counter-measures available. The simplest way to combat the system is to build drones that are already resistant to microwave interference, or potentially using a net launcher system. Another tactic could be to have the drone’s sensors and communications turn off when in range of the device, thus providing an advantage to other drones, like turning away to escape its field.
It is quite likely these types of systems are already in use in the same way many weapons systems are. The key is how well a system is designed to defend against such attacks, with the option of layered assets, like a combination of radar-guided guns and other anti-aircraft systems, for a combined effect.
The question arises of the form factor and the need for ideal conditions. Military applications always present unique challenges. A weapon that is only effective in perfect weather, or one that requires a massive setup, is limited. The military industrial complex will certainly explore ways to address these limitations, with the focus being on creating more flexible and robust solutions.
The implications for drone warfare are profound. Drones will become more resilient, employing advanced AI for navigation and target acquisition. This could lead to a form of “dark mode” for drones, where they operate autonomously within the microwave field, and resume normal operations when they exit the field. The concept of a drone swarm collectively making decisions based on telemetry is an exciting prospect.
Ultimately, the evolution of anti-drone technology will continue, with each advancement sparking a countermeasure. The race between offensive and defensive capabilities will shape the future of warfare, creating a complex and dynamic battlefield.