By John Q. Hosedrinker Stay informed with breaking news updates from around the globe with The Economic Times. The platform provides coverage of US, UK, Canadian, and international news events. Users can download the app for daily updates on the latest developments.
Read the original article here
Russia’s ex-President Dmitry Medvedev warns Trump again – ‘Bomb shelters won’t save you from nukes’ — it’s like a broken record, isn’t it? This whole situation, and Medvedev’s pronouncements, feels like a constant cycle. Every time this statement is made, it seems to diminish the credibility of Russia’s nuclear strategy further. It’s a bizarre thing to broadcast, really. Does the former president not understand that such rhetoric cuts both ways? It’s not as though Russia is the only country with these weapons, and the implication that they are is just… odd.
The consistent threats of nuclear annihilation, the repeated warnings of impending doom – it’s almost tedious at this point. It’s not a power play; it is, in fact, a sign of desperation. Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) is the name of the game, and everyone involved knows it. No one wins in this scenario. There are no winners. Just, well, dust. The issue isn’t that someone *doesn’t* know this, rather that the constant reminder only serves to highlight a reliance on nukes as their primary, and potentially only, strategic advantage.
It’s worth considering the state of their military equipment in general. If their conventional forces are struggling – and there’s plenty of evidence suggesting they are – what shape are their nukes really in? Are they even functional? It does make you wonder, doesn’t it? It makes a person question the overall condition of Russia’s entire military apparatus. If the broader picture isn’t one of strength and efficiency, that casts doubt on the reliability of all its systems.
This ongoing cycle of pronouncements only underscores a reliance on mutually assured destruction as a deterrent. It’s a grim dance, and it’s pretty apparent that the West can effectively retaliate, a factor that Russia has to acknowledge, even when Medvedev speaks. The fact that these threats continue to be broadcast to the world is, at the very least, odd, and at worst, a sign of something more concerning.
Medvedev, or whoever is running the show, seems to understand this, but there is also a role playing aspect going on. It’s all about projecting an image of unpredictability and instability. The idea is that crazy actions and statements make Putin appear sane. It’s theater, a performance meant to shape perceptions and maybe, just maybe, deter any actions perceived as threats to Russia. But it also seems to undermine their own supposed strength.
The maintenance issue is definitely a factor to keep in mind. Given the known issues with corruption and poor upkeep within the Russian military, the reliability of their nuclear arsenal is a fair question. The fact that they may be relying so heavily on these weapons is, at the very least, concerning. The truth is that the fear is being used to control the world through terror.
Trump is mentioned in this and the reason he is mentioned is obvious. He’s known for his impulsiveness and lack of understanding, which would definitely make it easier to push buttons, especially in the context of a nuclear attack. It becomes quite apparent, in this scenario, that there are no true “winners.” Every leader should keep in mind that the only way for us to survive is to maintain an accurate state of defense.
The response to any real nuclear threat would be to disable the threat before an attack. The entire idea is to deter attacks. That’s why the nuclear doctrine hinges on mutually assured destruction: a Pyrrhic victory for anyone who dared to use the weapons first. This is a threat that works both ways. The only reasonable response to an attack is retaliation.
These empty threats coming from Medvedev are an almost comical performance. It’s an act, and it highlights, yet again, that Russia’s strength rests almost entirely on its nuclear arsenal. Russia keeps shooting itself in the foot and yet, keeps making threats. It’s more about bravado and posturing, a way to demonstrate some perceived authority on the global stage.
Perhaps, and this is speculation, Medvedev is speaking directly to Putin. Medvedev’s statements often sound more like a performance for a single audience member. Putin himself. The message is one of subservience, of loyalty, all while offering a veneer of boldness. It’s a show of devotion and a strange play of power.
If you’re going to take any of this seriously, it’s worth mentioning that the idea that nuclear weapons are a solution is beyond questionable. The only way to have a reasonable response is to make sure it doesn’t happen. These constant threats are tiring and only highlight the desperation that, some would argue, drives these kind of statements. It’s like someone is daring the world to call their bluff.