By Matt Underwood Massie: Trump ‘may be covering for some rich and powerful people’ in Epstein files. That’s a loaded statement, isn’t it? It’s not a matter of *if* Trump is protecting himself. It’s a matter of *how* he’s doing it, and the implications are vast. The consensus here seems to be that the primary motivation is self-preservation, with any other protection being a secondary byproduct of that.
And so, the conversation quickly pivots to Trump’s own potential involvement. It’s not a leap to assume he’s on the list. He was friendly with Epstein for years, and this connection is often cited. The idea that Trump’s actions are solely about keeping himself out of trouble resonates strongly. The potential repercussions of other names being revealed, and the subsequent media frenzy, is a concern. He’d likely be willing to throw others under the bus, but not if their downfall would also bring him down.
The use of the word “may” by Massie is a point of contention. It’s considered by some to be a weasel word. The overall tone implies a strong belief that Trump is indeed implicated. He’s essentially covering for himself, with any other protection being a bonus. This is not about altruism; it’s about self-preservation. The sentiment expressed throughout is a lack of surprise that someone like Trump would prioritize his own interests.
The focus then turns to the broader implications of these files. The assumption is that the individuals implicated are, by and large, very wealthy and powerful. They are people who run the world. The redactions are seen as a way to protect these elites. The idea that justice is being sacrificed for the sake of maintaining a certain social order permeates the discussion.
The discussion goes on to highlight how powerful individuals get access to such things. Those not rich or powerful are unlikely to be found on the list. This highlights the perception of a system where the elite are shielded from consequences, reinforcing the sense of cynicism. The general feeling is the system is rigged in favor of the powerful, and the Epstein files are a prime example of this.
Another topic that arises is the death of Epstein while in custody. There’s a deep skepticism surrounding the circumstances of his death, with many wondering how such a thing could have happened under the watch of the Trump administration. The idea that there was either negligence or intent is prevalent. There is a push to hold Trump accountable for this, even if he is on the list.
Trump’s long-standing relationships with people on the list are brought up. The possibility of the “innocent” people being harmed is seemingly the excuse for burying the investigation. It also appears as though the reputation of the elite is valued more than the pursuit of justice for the victims. The prevailing sentiment is one of disgust, a feeling that the victims are being further victimized by the cover-up.
It also appears as though there is concern that these powerful donors may not get exposed. Many people have stated that they would like to see the unredacted files. There’s a sense of a deep-seated injustice and a desire for accountability, for not just Trump, but for all of those involved.