By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The National Conservatism Conference (NatCon) has emerged as a platform for a more extreme vision of conservatism, diverging from the traditional focus on individual liberty. Speakers at the conference advocated for a return to Christian identity and a focus on limiting immigration, with some openly calling to overturn landmark legal decisions. Prominent figures in attendance included those with strong ties to the MAGA movement and its desire to aggressively wield federal power. One particularly alarming speech by Missouri Senator Eric Schmitt promoted the idea that America belongs exclusively to the descendants of white Europeans, echoing the sentiments of the “Great Replacement Theory”. This rhetoric of exclusion and power grabs represents a significant shift within the conservative movement.
Read the original article here
MAGA’s plan for a white Christian America is unfolding before our eyes. We’re seeing it manifest in various ways, from political rhetoric to legislative initiatives, and it’s a cause for serious concern. At the heart of this agenda is the desire to reshape America in the image of a specific vision: a nation dominated by white, Christian values. This isn’t just a casual aspiration; it’s a concrete plan with tangible goals.
Perhaps the most striking example of this agenda in action is the rhetoric surrounding “American identity”. Senator Eric Schmitt’s speech is a prime example, invoking a historical narrative that prioritizes white European descendants and their role in building the nation. It essentially excludes the contributions and experiences of non-white, non-Christian groups. This selective historical framing, where certain groups are erased or minimized, is a common tactic used to legitimize the desired demographic and cultural shift.
The Heritage Foundation’s “Project 2025” is another significant piece of the puzzle. While there’s debate over the group’s goals and reliability, the project offers a detailed blueprint for reshaping the federal government. It’s a roadmap that aligns with the broader aims of establishing a white Christian America, with policies that would likely favor specific religious and cultural viewpoints. The concern here is that these aren’t just abstract ideas; they are actionable strategies.
It’s important to acknowledge that the demographics of the United States are changing. The push for a white Christian America is, in a way, a reaction to this shift. The hope is that by promoting a certain vision of the past and the future, they can maintain their cultural and political dominance. Yet, attempts to enforce an apartheid-like system, no matter how subtle, would be highly unsustainable. History teaches us that such ideologies are ultimately doomed to fail, due to internal resistance, international condemnation, and fundamental contradictions.
The rhetoric employed often presents a distorted version of Christianity. True Christianity, at least in its core teachings, emphasizes compassion, inclusion, and love. What we see today is a perversion of these values, used as a tool to advance a nationalist and exclusionary agenda. It’s about power and control, not about genuine faith. It is an aggressive nationalism masquerading as religious conviction.
Many of these individuals actively go against core Christian principles. This is more of a political ideology than a religious one. It’s crucial to distinguish between genuine Christian values and the distorted version being promoted by this movement. The values are worlds apart.
The media’s role in this context is also important to consider. There is a sense that certain media outlets are willing to sanitize or even amplify this rhetoric for clicks and views. The lack of critical examination and the willingness to normalize extreme viewpoints are dangerous. The media can be complicit in the spread of this agenda, making it all the more important to be critical of the information we consume.
The consequences of this movement are dire. There is a risk of increased division, violence, and intolerance. The safety and security of minority groups, including religious minorities and immigrants, are at stake. We are witnessing a push toward a society where certain groups are privileged while others are marginalized or excluded.
In response, it’s crucial to engage in open and honest dialogue. We need to talk to our neighbors and friends about the threats that we’re facing. We can confront them by providing information. Also, focusing on organizing, voting strategically, and supporting policies that promote inclusivity and equality.
The path forward requires vigilance, resilience, and a commitment to the core values of a diverse and inclusive America. It is essential to understand that this agenda is not inevitable. It can be resisted. It must be resisted.