By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Luxembourg announced its intention to recognize the state of Palestine, with a final decision expected at the U.N. General Assembly in New York later this month, aligning with calls from European leaders for an end to the war in Gaza. This declaration follows a U.N. General Assembly vote endorsing steps toward a two-state solution, with a deadline before its September 22nd meeting. This shift comes amid mounting pressure, including statements from the EU, with actions such as pausing payments to Israel and sanctioning individuals.
Read the original article here
Luxembourg to recognize the state of Palestine. Let’s break this down, shall we? This isn’t just some empty gesture; there’s a framework, a roadmap, if you will. The details are crucial. We’re talking about recognizing the Palestinian Authority (PA) as the legitimate political leadership. Think of it like this: the PA would be the recognized government, not Hamas. That’s a significant distinction.
Now, a very valid point is raised: what about the specifics? Will it be two separate entities, Gaza and the West Bank? Or a unified Palestine, potentially encompassing all the land? The approach here, based on the discussions surrounding this move, is a two-state solution. That means recognizing the borders as they existed before 1967, which includes the West Bank (excluding West Jerusalem) and Gaza. Think of it as a path toward two independent nations, side-by-side.
A crucial question often arises: Have the Palestinians actually been asked if they want this? The answer appears to be yes. The PA, through its representatives, has voiced support for this two-state solution. This indicates a desire to engage with the international community and pursue a path toward peace, and this international push to create the state of Palestine may aid in these peace talks.
The issue of leadership and control is central. It’s vital to remember that the recognition of a state doesn’t necessarily mean recognition of its government. Just because a state is recognized doesn’t mean the specific governing body within that state is also automatically recognized. While the PA is being recognized as the legitimate government, the lack of control over Gaza presents a complex situation. This is similar to how Afghanistan was handled in the past – a recognized state with a recognized government despite the reality on the ground.
Also, there have been talks about the potential impacts regarding war crimes, and whether recognition could create additional opportunities for accountability.
This isn’t about removing Israel; it’s about acknowledging Palestine’s right to exist. The recognition would be accompanied by a push for sanctions if Israel continues to pursue policies that undermine a two-state solution.
The crucial takeaway is this: recognizing Palestine doesn’t automatically legitimize Hamas. The focus is on the PA as the legitimate governing body. This is about moving forward, establishing a framework for peace, and applying pressure where necessary to ensure a just resolution for both Israelis and Palestinians.