By John Q. Hosedrinker 
In a recent interview with the BBC, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva stated he has “no relationship” with former US President Donald Trump. Lula criticized Trump’s imposition of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods, deeming them “eminently political” and detrimental to US consumers. Despite Trump’s claims of openness, Lula revealed the two leaders have never spoken directly and asserted that the Trump administration was unwilling to communicate civilly. Lula contrasted his strained relationship with Trump with his successful diplomatic ties globally, highlighting his continued alliances with Russia and China.
Read the original article here
I have no relationship with Trump, Brazil’s President Lula tells BBC, and that’s the headline. It’s a pretty straightforward statement, and it sets the tone for what seems to be a perfectly reasonable position. Lula clearly states that the relationship between Trump and Brazil was really a relationship between Trump and Bolsonaro, the former Brazilian president. This feels like a clear distinction, a way of saying, “I’m not part of that history.” And honestly, who could blame him?
The article also highlights that should Lula encounter Trump at the United Nations General Assembly, a simple greeting would be exchanged, because, as Lula puts it, he’s a “civilized citizen.” However, the statement also includes a rather pointed observation, a subtle dig: “he’s not emperor of the world!”. It’s a reminder that Trump’s influence, while considerable, doesn’t extend to absolute authority.
Then there’s that comment about Trump’s son, Eduardo, and a “personal favor” involving a cell in Brazil. This is a pretty biting statement on Trump’s position and possible actions. Lula may be making an indirect reference to the law and order that he respects, and also a dig at Trump’s alleged conduct. It’s quite the contrast to the apparent lack of accountability for similar issues in the US. The comments highlight how Brazil is handling its own political issues, and implicitly contrasts it with the US’s approach to similar challenges.
The sentiment that “Respect is earned!” also surfaces as a response. The statement is a clear signal that there is no forced respect. It speaks to the fact that Lula does not respect Trump, and it’s a response that carries a certain weight. It’s easy to understand why this kind of stance is being taken. It underscores the idea that political relationships should be based on mutual respect and shared values, not just forced interactions.
The response shows some of the political realities at play. The notion that Brazil had an “anomaly” in its history and that almost half the population wanted amnesty for Bolsonaro sheds light on the political divisions within the country. It’s a reminder that even when leaders take a stand, it doesn’t mean everyone agrees.
The constant presence of Trump’s name and actions in the discussion, even on seemingly unrelated topics, is also mentioned. This observation is interesting because it’s a common feeling. The sheer volume of attention Trump commands is, for many, overwhelming.
The suggestion that Brazil’s institutions are still “filled to the brim with corrupt bastards” is a blunt acknowledgement of ongoing challenges. Even with Bolsonaro out of power, deep-seated issues remain, which shows that the road ahead is not clear or free of hurdles. It’s a dose of realism, reminding everyone that while progress is possible, it’s an ongoing process.