By John Q. Hosedrinker 
David Letterman weighed in on the indefinite suspension of Jimmy Kimmel Live! at the Atlantic Festival, condemning the move as a result of an “authoritarian criminal administration” in the Oval Office. Letterman, who hosted late-night shows for decades, stated he never faced pressure from any governmental agency regarding his political humor. He criticized the Federal Communications Commission’s Brendan Carr and expressed his belief that Kimmel’s situation reflects a broader trend of managed media and manipulation within the industry. Letterman also mentioned the end of Stephen Colbert’s run on late night at CBS, saying that it was “inexcusable”, as the show was being manipulated to appease the president.
Read the original article here
So, the news that David Letterman has weighed in on the situation surrounding Jimmy Kimmel’s potential suspension by ABC and, more broadly, the current political climate is quite something. It’s not every day we hear from Letterman on these types of issues, but given the stakes, it’s not surprising. The core of his message is, let’s be frank, pretty clear: he considers Donald Trump an “authoritarian criminal.”
Letterman’s response seems to stem from the FCC’s involvement in the situation. The idea that a government agency would pressure a network into removing a late-night host for political reasons is, frankly, chilling. It’s a direct challenge to the First Amendment. This directly conflicts with the very fabric of free speech that America’s supposed to be built upon. This is the crux of the problem. The potential suspension, in Letterman’s view, is just another instance of Trump attempting to silence his critics and exert control.
And let’s be clear, Letterman isn’t alone in this assessment. A lot of the talk online indicates a growing concern about the erosion of free speech and the government’s overreach into media. There’s a definite sentiment that this isn’t just about Kimmel; it’s about setting a precedent. It is about who can be on TV and who cannot based on their opinions. It creates a chilling effect.
The article highlights the potential dangers of these actions, emphasizing the hypocrisy of those who once cried “cancel culture” now embracing censorship. This isn’t just about a political disagreement; it’s about something far more fundamental: the right to express yourself freely, and not being afraid to be fired for it. The fact that this is happening in the United States of America, a country founded on the principles of freedom, should raise alarm bells for anyone who values democracy.
The article makes it apparent that the line between democracy and autocracy is blurring. It is increasingly obvious in modern times that there is not as much free speech as there was previously. Free speech is an important tenet of democracy, and one of the most important principles of the United States of America.
The potential consequences of letting this go unchecked are significant. If the government can dictate what media outlets broadcast, it can ultimately control the narrative. It will suppress truth, and it will control what people see and hear. This situation is a testament to the importance of a free press and the need for media outlets to be protected from political interference. This situation isn’t just about the freedom of comedians to make jokes; it’s about the freedom of the entire country to think for themselves.
Finally, the fact that Letterman, a figure who has spent decades in the public eye, is speaking out about this is significant. It suggests that the situation is severe enough to merit his attention. His experience in late-night television gives his words an even greater weight. If someone like Letterman feels compelled to speak out, it signals that this is a moment that demands attention. It’s a clear indication of the risks to American freedom. The bottom line: David Letterman’s reaction is a call to arms, a wake-up call that demands attention.