By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison briefly surpassed Elon Musk to become the world’s richest person on Wednesday morning, with his wealth reaching nearly $400 billion. This surge was driven by Oracle’s announcement of a substantial backlog for cloud services, including significant AI-related contracts with companies like Nvidia and OpenAI. Ellison’s family has also been expanding its influence, including a recent $8 billion takeover of Paramount Global, further contributing to his financial growth. Additionally, Ellison is involved in a massive datacenter project with Softbank and OpenAI, utilizing Oracle technology.
Read the original article here
Larry Ellison eclipses Elon Musk as world’s richest person, billionaires index says, and it sparks an immediate reaction – a mix of bewilderment and disdain. This news isn’t met with celebration, but rather a collective sigh, accompanied by observations on the physical appearance of the newly crowned top billionaire. The general consensus? He doesn’t exactly exude an aura of health and prosperity. Comments hint at a “villain” aesthetic, the sort of look that would make one question his moral compass and remind the reader of a cartoonish robber baron. The fact that we even have a “billionaires index” in the first place becomes a target of criticism.
This shift in the rankings is not seen as a victory for the general public. Rather, the news fuels the perception that the ultra-wealthy are detached from the realities of everyday life. It’s a reminder that even at the pinnacle of financial success, appearances can be deceiving. There’s a palpable sense of unease, as if the world’s richest person has donned a mask of decay.
The commentary suggests that the focus should be on the impact of wealth, or rather the lack thereof, on the wider community. The general sentiment is that these billionaires could be contributing to more positive outcomes, and in this respect, their wealth is not seen in a positive light.
One aspect that is raised is the source of Ellison’s recent success. Oracle’s impressive growth projections, which are met with skeptical optimism, are brought into focus. The company’s promise of such rapid revenue expansion feels more like a bubble than a sustainable boom. The implications of this projected growth lead many to question how, and more importantly *why*, the market is so eager to buy into it.
The discussion also touches on Ellison’s past, specifically his alleged political connections. The reminder of his association with figures like Sean Hannity and Lindsay Graham in the aftermath of the 2020 election further fuels skepticism. It adds another layer to the narrative, painting a picture of an individual not afraid to engage in questionable political activity. It suggests that he is willing to align himself with those who seek to undermine democratic processes.
The comparison between Ellison and Musk is also central to the discussion. Although neither is viewed positively, there’s a nuanced take: some would take Ellison, despite his flaws, over Musk. This is because they don’t see Musk’s ego as being an asset. They highlight Ellison’s more moderate stance on certain issues, such as his acceptance of his daughter’s sexuality. While not an endorsement, it’s seen as a slightly more palatable brand of billionaire behavior.
The conversation flows towards the more practical realities of working for companies like Oracle, drawing on personal experience, the comments shared suggest that even in a company with massive financial reserves, employee compensation is lacking. The stories of pay freezes and unfair distribution of bonuses paint a picture of a company where profits don’t necessarily trickle down to the workforce. This reinforces the impression that these billionaires are not necessarily benevolent leaders.
Beyond the criticisms, the overall tone is one of exasperation. People are fed up with the constant parade of wealth and the apparent lack of positive change it brings. The conversation ends on a cynical note, with frustration expressed toward a system that allows such wealth to be concentrated while basic needs go unmet. The observation that “world’s richest person” is a title often held by less-than-ideal individuals sums up this collective sense of disillusionment.