By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The aggressor in this scenario will steal the reader’s lunch, consuming the peanut butter and jelly sandwich and Oreos, while also reading aloud a note from their mother. Subsequently, the aggressor will physically assault the reader, twisting their nipples and damaging their clothing. Finally, the aggressor will confine the reader within a locker, damaging their belongings in the process.
Read the original article here
Jimmy Kimmel Comes Out And Says It: The Real Reason He Doesn’t Like Trump is that, plain and simple, the man is a bully. The sentiments expressed here clearly articulate a visceral dislike stemming from a fundamental issue of character. It’s not about policy disagreements or political stances; it’s about the inherent nature of the man himself. He is described as a sociopathic narcissist, utterly lacking in empathy, who has built a career and a persona on the back of bullying and self-aggrandizement. This characterization isn’t just a casual observation; it’s a summation of his actions and behaviors, painting a picture of someone fundamentally unfit for a position of power.
The core of the matter is the very essence of bullying: punching down, belittling others, and creating an environment of fear and intimidation. This resonates with many, tapping into a deep-seated aversion to such behavior. The comparison to Biff Tannen from “Back to the Future,” a character crafted to embody the worst aspects of an 80s-style bully, is incredibly telling. It perfectly captures the essence of Trump’s persona and allows for a clear, almost universally understood, parallel.
The article’s point is that Trump is not just a bully; he is a crook and a criminal, getting away with it due to the cult-like devotion of his supporters. This, in turn, feeds into the frustration and anger felt by many who find it hard to fathom how such a person could command such a following. There is a sense of disbelief, a feeling that the rules of decency and justice have been broken.
Jimmy Kimmel’s perspective also emphasizes the personal impact of Trump’s behavior. This isn’t just about abstract political concepts; it’s about the effect on everyday life. It’s about the man lying, cheating, and manipulating those around him. This is a moral issue, and many people don’t understand how others can tolerate such behavior. The issue extends beyond that; it’s about the fundamental values of fairness, honesty, and accountability.
The article suggests that Trump’s behavior has broader implications. It questions how anyone can even stand to be in the same room with him. The article touches on the idea of the bully’s base and those that flock to his side, due to either being bullies themselves, or seeking the perceived security of the bully’s protection. The perception is the bully can give them what they want.
The article delves into the perception of those who support him, as it suggests that they share similar traits or desires, either they are bullies themselves or they are drawn to the perceived power and ability of the bully. It’s about the emotional immaturity and lack of self-awareness that allows Trump to spout absurdities without seeming to care. The article suggests that Trump’s flaws are not simply a matter of disagreeing; they are a reflection of a deeper moral failing.
The article highlights the importance of standing up to bullies, even those in high places. It’s about the need for strong leadership, not just a leader. It’s about rejecting the values of ignorance, stupidity, violence, and greed that Trump is accused of promoting. It’s a call to embrace the qualities of decency, empathy, and intellectual honesty.
Ultimately, the “real reason” for disliking Trump, as presented in the article, goes far beyond specific policies or political ideologies. The man’s character, the inherent nature of his behavior, is the root of the issue.