By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Apple TV+ has decided to postpone the premiere of “The Savant,” a series starring Jessica Chastain, which was slated to debut on Friday. Chastain, while valuing her partnership with Apple, stated she does not align with the decision to delay the show’s release. The miniseries, focusing on an investigator infiltrating online hate groups, was adapted from a 2019 article. The postponement comes at a sensitive time for media companies facing political pressure, following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk and other recent acts of violence.
Read the original article here
Jessica Chastain “not ‘aligned’ with Apple’s decision to delay series about hate groups.” seems like a pretty clear indicator of where things stand. It’s almost impossible not to notice the irony, isn’t it?
Apple’s decision to delay a series about hate groups, especially given the context, raises eyebrows. It’s not difficult to connect the dots, especially when considering the history of corporate behavior when faced with controversy.
Google’s recent actions, unbanning individuals known for spreading misinformation and hateful rhetoric under the guise of “free speech” and a desire for “more conservative voices,” offer further clues. This move seems to acknowledge that certain conservative voices are, at the very least, associated with falsehoods.
This is not to say that all conservatives are wrong. Instead, it is to point out the obvious that hate groups are the epitome of easily manipulated people.
The parallels between corporate interests and the rise of certain political ideologies are difficult to ignore. The fear is not only that these corporations are complicit but also that they are actively participating in a trend that could become irreversible.
Big business, it seems, is becoming increasingly comfortable in the face of these shifts, recognizing that their interests align with those who are dismantling regulations and protections. Their behavior mirrors a long and unfortunate history.
Cutting ties with these corporations, though difficult, appears to be a reasonable course of action. Supporting local businesses, artists, and creatives becomes a way to reclaim autonomy.
It’s a reminder that corporations are not on our side. They have their own agenda and are willing to prioritize profit over principles, and we are at the point where it’s impossible to ignore.
The choice to disengage from these entities is ultimately a personal one, but one that should be considered. When you find yourself, or recognize anyone else that’s self-identified, getting too attached to the products, or the media of a certain brand, it’s vital to remember that you’re more than just a walking advertisement for a corporate entity.
The landscape of media and politics has shifted dramatically. Remember when Nazis were easily identified villains? Now, they are…well, that’s a loaded question. It’s a chilling illustration of how swiftly norms can be upended.
The increasing alignment between corporate interests and the rhetoric of certain groups is a significant issue. When hate speech becomes a tool for manipulation, and when corporations prioritize profit over principles, the implications are alarming.
The narrative is, essentially, that the show about hate groups was delayed in a response to the death of Charlie Kirk. This opens questions about whose interests are being protected and what messages are being prioritized.
The broader picture is of a world where objective reality is being rejected. This can take the form of what the right and left both deem “hate speech”.
It’s hard to break the cycle. Relying on tech companies to self-censor is a futile task. The only thing that we can do is find common ground.