By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The emergence of Donald Trump’s alleged birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein, featuring a crude illustration and signature, has created a setback for Vice President J.D. Vance, who initially dismissed the story as “complete and utter bulls–t” and questioned its authenticity. The House Oversight Committee has received a copy of the letter, which Trump denies writing and has resulted in a $10 billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal. Despite the letter’s release, Vance has not retracted his previous statements and has continued to attack Democrats, even after Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna called on Vance to take back his remarks.
Read the original article here
JD Vance’s Old Epstein Post Comes Back to Bite Him, or rather, doesn’t seem to. The initial reaction seems to be a mix of disbelief and cynicism. Many observers seem to agree that a past social media post about Jeffrey Epstein, likely of a problematic or insensitive nature, has resurfaced. But the prevailing sentiment isn’t that this revelation is going to be a career-ender for the Ohio Senator. Rather, the consensus seems to be: “So what?”
The core issue is that, in the current political climate, actions that would once be considered career-ending seem to barely cause a ripple. People are already noting that the MAGA base, which Vance heavily courted and ultimately aligned himself with, appears impervious to this sort of controversy. They’ve been described as a “cult,” and those people likely won’t care. This suggests a disconnect between the outrage some might feel and the actual political ramifications. It’s not that these things aren’t being revealed, it’s that they’re increasingly falling on deaf ears.
JD Vance’s Old Epstein Post Comes Back to Bite Him because, in the words of one person, “they have no shame.” This echoes a broader sentiment about the supposed lack of accountability among political figures. The observation is that a pattern has emerged: deny, deflect, and the story eventually fades from the news cycle. The implication is that the political playbook now favors shamelessness, which means that a post from the past, no matter how damaging, is unlikely to cause significant harm. This is supported by the observation that other politicians are in similar situations with no consequences.
The discussion points out that the “bite” is not happening. Someone notes that if he is not going to face consequences for his actions, any concern about his social media history seems misplaced. The idea is that he might be poised to gain more power. Therefore, any expectation of him feeling shame or embarrassment seems unrealistic, and the fact that he is aligning himself more and more with Trump’s style is further evidence of this.
JD Vance’s Old Epstein Post Comes Back to Bite Him, it’s also mentioned that the timing of these revelations can be suspect, such as one document being released nine years too late. This highlights the feeling that these revelations are not effective at getting people to care. The fact that he can brush aside criticism and maintain the support of his base makes the entire exercise feel futile.
The article makes reference to the apparent political strategy of burying bad news under the guise of “fake news.” This tactic appears to involve discrediting any criticism through attacks on the media, which allows individuals to distance themselves from the consequences of their words and actions. It is another indicator of the political shift towards shamelessness and lack of accountability.
JD Vance’s Old Epstein Post Comes Back to Bite Him, but it does not seem to be the case. The discussion around it also emphasizes the role of the media and its potential impact on political careers. There’s a critical view of certain media outlets, with some suggesting they are more focused on sensationalism than on providing balanced coverage. The discussion shows that the general feeling is one of frustration, not just at Vance, but also at the apparent futility of these revelations in the current political climate.