By John Q. Hosedrinker 
During the Zapad-2025 exercises, Russia has deployed Iskander-M missile systems in the Kaliningrad region, positioning them within striking distance of several NATO countries. At least two launchers carrying 9M723 ballistic missiles were spotted near the Polish border, with a range of approximately 500 kilometers, putting nearly all of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, parts of Estonia, and other areas within reach. The deployment, a part of exercises involving up to 30,000 troops, has prompted responses from NATO, including contingency plans and the Eastern Sentry mission, particularly after Russian drone violations. The Iskander’s ability to launch various missiles and its mobile nature pose significant challenges for detection and rapid repositioning.
Read the original article here
Russia Deploys Iskander Missiles in Kaliningrad, Putting NATO Capitals From Warsaw to Berlin in Range, and honestly, it’s not quite the headline-grabbing revelation some might think it is. The Iskander missiles themselves, and the fact that they bring capitals like Warsaw and Berlin within range, is less of a surprise than one might think. Let’s be clear, neither of these cities were ever exactly out of range, historically.
The very presence of Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad isn’t entirely new, to be honest. There’s been a persistent deployment for years, and that’s something that needs to be acknowledged. Considering this has been ongoing for quite some time, the real question is, why is it suddenly being presented as such a major development? You could argue that the constant presence of these missiles, along with the potential of nuclear warheads, has been a long-standing reality.
One point worth highlighting is the potential for a serious response should they be fired. If they are deployed, will it be met with an almost immediate response, such as the bombing of anything military-related in Kaliningrad? It could be a possibility. Some would say that this aggressive placement of missiles is a sign of weakness and fear on Russia’s part. Perhaps a bluff in the ongoing game of geopolitical posturing, or perhaps a genuine escalation of an already tense situation.
The debate also extends to the effectiveness of these missiles. Some have suggested that the missile systems aren’t as advanced as one may think. It’s the defense that is the issue and the intercept capabilities of other countries. Others bring up the question of whether they are capable of reaching Ukraine? This is another important question.
Let’s not forget about the broader geopolitical implications. The close proximity of these missiles and the possibility of conflict with the West. The possibility of any attack would cause concern and may lead to more intense summits to try to resolve the situation.
In the context of a potential conflict, the question of who would be victorious is an interesting one. With nations like France and the UK possessing working nuclear weapons, the outcome of any conventional war is in doubt. The resources and allies that the West has are also another point of discussion.
There’s also the argument that the deployment is less about offense and more about bolstering an already existing military presence in the region. The city-enclave of Kaliningrad is relatively small. This geographical limitation means that there isn’t much room to maneuver when deploying missiles. However, even with those limitations, it’s a significant location for military build-up.
So, in conclusion, while the deployment of Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad is a relevant development, it’s not necessarily the seismic shift that it might be presented as. It’s a reminder of the ongoing military presence in the region and the geopolitical complexities at play. It is, perhaps, a continuation of a pattern rather than a sudden and unexpected event.