By John Q. Hosedrinker 
On September 22, 2025, French President Emmanuel Macron recognized a Palestinian state during a UN summit aimed at garnering support for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Australia, Britain, Canada, and Portugal also took the symbolic step, applying pressure on Israel as its retaliatory war in Gaza intensified. Macron made the release of hostages held by Hamas a precondition for opening a French embassy to the Palestinian state, while Israel warned of repercussions. The United States opposed the move, with Germany also refusing to recognize a Palestinian state.
Read the original article here
France recognizes the State of Palestine, and President Macron’s declaration at the UN, that’s the news. It’s a significant move, especially as the number of nations recognizing Palestine continues to climb. The implication is that, by the end of the day, a large majority of UN members – perhaps around 160 out of 193 – will acknowledge Palestine’s statehood. Macron, it seems, has been playing a key role in pushing this forward, including encouraging the UK and other European countries to follow suit.
If we consider Israel’s reactions and potential escalations, it’s reasonable to anticipate further recognition from Europe. This might indicate a major failure of Israel’s diplomatic efforts, a reversal of what seemed impossible just a short time ago. Some might say that Western nations are acknowledging a Palestinian state that doesn’t truly represent the Palestinian people’s desires. Is it not complicated that the Palestinian Authority isn’t exactly who the Palestinians want? Many, it seems, would prefer Hamas. Coupled with differing views on the 1967 borders, the situation presents complexities.
The question of which Palestinian government France and other nations are recognizing is crucial. The article doesn’t clarify whether France and other nations recognize Hamas for Gaza and the Palestine Liberation Organization for the West Bank. If this is the case, it raises the question of how one can recognize a state with two different governing bodies. This also sparks the question, will Hamas follow the Geneva Convention? On the other hand, if Israel continues to escalate, it may lead to isolation.
This is also being perceived by some as a reward for terrorism, which started with the October 7th attacks. And, despite the intention, it could also be seen as giving the Palestinians statehood in response to a war campaign started by Hamas, a group holding hostages and refusing to end their attacks. Israel’s reaction could be to recognize other disputed territories, such as New Caledonia and Corsica, to highlight the hypocrisy.
The United States’ stance, however, remains a hurdle. The U.S. is likely to continue vetoing the recognition of Palestine, potentially isolating France and the UK in the process. Some are wondering, what’s the point? What about statehood, borders, and a government?
The debate also raises questions about the role of international bodies and the potential impact of such recognition. Is it a case of rewarding terrorism, or is this a necessary step to help create a peace process to protect Palestinians from the Israeli Defense Forces and the current government? Many are asking about the future and the potential for a global conflict, as the situation escalates.
There’s also criticism directed at countries like France, Spain, and the UK for being seen as hypocritical. These are countries that have, arguably, had a hand in various global conflicts. It’s also suggested that the move is a way for France to gain votes, in light of President Macron’s recent comments.
It’s a very complex picture. Some argue that recognizing Palestine is the wrong move, coming after Hamas’s actions. The question of the government and borders needs to be clearly defined. Others believe that international recognition will aid in the peace process, even if Israel continues its actions in the area. There’s the need for dialogue, even with those who may be considered enemies.