By John Q. Hosedrinker 
The article draws comparisons between the policies of the Trump administration and the Cuban government, citing actions like aggressive immigration checks and attacks on the LGBTQ+ community. These similarities, along with economic concerns, have led some Cuban-Americans in Florida to reconsider their support for the former president. Despite this, polls suggest that many Cuban-Americans still support Trump, even as deportations and restrictions on travel to Cuba impact their community. Ultimately, the community is facing a range of challenges, including fears about deportation, asylum denials, and questions surrounding the Cuban Adjustment Act.
Read the original article here
Florida’s Cubans are now divided on Trump: ‘He acts like Fidel’ is a complex situation, a political realignment fueled by a painful historical context colliding with the realities of contemporary American politics. It appears that a significant shift is underway in the Cuban-American community in Florida, where the fervent anti-communist sentiment that once united them is now fractured by the actions and rhetoric of Donald Trump.
The core of the division, it seems, revolves around a jarring comparison: Trump’s behavior and the shadow of Fidel Castro. This echoes a deep-seated fear within the Cuban community. For decades, many Florida Cubans have seen themselves as refugees from a totalitarian regime, and the last thing they wanted was a leader in the United States who resembled the very dictator they fled. The irony isn’t lost on anyone, given that anti-communism was a major driver of their political leanings.
The argument goes that Trump’s autocratic tendencies, his dismissiveness of dissent, his cult of personality, and his pronouncements of being the only one who can fix things – all of it hits familiar notes for those who lived under Castro. The very characteristics they feared in Cuba are now being mirrored in the American political landscape, causing a major conflict of conscience. This is further exacerbated by the fact that some policies, like attempts to limit immigration, contradict the values that drove many Cuban immigrants to seek refuge in the US.
This also seems to be a case of realizing too late what was happening. Many of the critiques point to the fact that Trump didn’t hide his true nature. He openly expressed admiration for dictators and showed a disregard for democratic norms. The fact that some Cubans apparently missed the signs, or ignored them, is a major source of frustration. The sentiment is that it’s difficult to feel much sympathy for those who, after being repeatedly warned, ultimately voted for someone whose actions now mirror their worst fears.
The underlying issue, as some see it, is a misunderstanding of what constitutes conservatism. The assumption that aligning with the Republican party will automatically protect their interests, without really taking a deeper look at the actual policies, is seen as a fundamental error. The emphasis, it seems, has been on fighting communism, rather than ensuring their place within the new social dynamics. They seem to have failed to grasp the essence of conservative values that often don’t match their own needs.
Adding to the complexity is the realization that many of the people they supported don’t view them in the same way. This revelation, that the “MAGA ingroup” doesn’t necessarily see Cuban-Americans as “white” or truly part of their exclusive club, is a significant blow. The dream of being part of this white, conservative America, it turns out, was never really meant for them. Their perceived proximity to whiteness, it appears, was not enough to overcome the barriers of identity.
The political allegiances appear to be based on a deeply emotional, historical context. This has perhaps overshadowed a clear-eyed assessment of the Republican platform. This blind spot meant that some were not ready to see that the party’s platform did not serve their best interests. Now, the consequences of these choices are becoming increasingly clear, leading to a political awakening, and the formation of new political alignments.
There is, of course, the element of disbelief in the situation. How, some wonder, could anyone be surprised? The signs were there, plain for all to see. The very characteristics that defined the Cuban experience are now found in the American political landscape, and it’s an uncomfortable truth that challenges their core beliefs. Yet, in some ways, it’s a tragic but predictable outcome of a community struggling with its history, its identity, and its future.
The situation underscores the importance of independent thought, looking past the surface and analyzing the real-world implications of political choices. It’s a lesson in the dangers of political tribalism. It also shows the potential for a community to evolve and change. It is a story of political awakening and a realization that the political landscape is never static.