By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Former Israeli army commander Herzi Halevi has revealed that over 200,000 Palestinians have been killed or injured in the Gaza war, a figure aligning with Gaza’s health ministry data. Halevi confirmed that legal advice never inhibited military operations during his time leading the IDF, despite the involvement of military lawyers. He later went on to suggest that the main importance of Israel’s military lawyers was to defend the IDF’s actions legally in the international arena. Critics, such as human rights lawyer Michael Sfard, have since interpreted Halevi’s remarks as confirmation that legal advisers serve to rubber stamp IDF actions.
Read the original article here
‘We took the gloves off’ – the chilling phrase uttered by a former IDF chief, now coupled with the confirmation of over 200,000 casualties in Gaza, paints a grim picture. It’s a stark admission, one that demands we confront the reality of what’s unfolded. The immediate response is one of shock, and it’s easy to understand why. To hear such a staggering figure, representing a significant portion of Gaza’s population, is a sobering wake-up call. It forces us to reckon with the scale of the devastation and loss.
This confirmation, particularly coming from a former IDF official, carries immense weight. It’s not just a number; it’s a validation of the suffering, the loss, and the destruction that’s been unfolding. It’s hard not to feel a sense of outrage when considering that, according to these figures, the very fabric of a society has been torn apart, and an entire people have been subjected to what is, at the very least, an immense tragedy.
The phrase “taking the gloves off” is particularly telling. It conjures images of a no-holds-barred approach, a willingness to disregard the usual constraints. It’s a signal that the rules of engagement were fundamentally altered, suggesting a shift away from restraint and a greater emphasis on achieving military objectives, regardless of the human cost. The implications are clear, and they’re chilling. It challenges the narrative that’s been carefully constructed, one where every casualty is merely collateral damage. It questions the very definition of war.
The revelation of over 200,000 casualties, encompassing both those killed and injured, compels us to question the justifications and rationalizations that have been offered. It underscores the potential for war crimes, and the urgent need for accountability. This isn’t just about numbers; it’s about human lives, each one a story, each one a tragedy. It forces a reevaluation of the events that have transpired and a deeper examination of the policies that led to this outcome.
Of course, there are those who will argue this is merely the unfortunate consequence of conflict, a tragic byproduct of war. However, when we consider the scale of the casualties, the destruction of infrastructure, and the deliberate targeting of civilians, it becomes increasingly difficult to accept this narrative. It’s about recognizing the fundamental principles of international law and the protection of civilians.
The question of genocide is central to this conversation. While debates rage over the legal definition, the sheer scale of the casualties and the context of the conflict raise serious questions. When over 10% of a population is killed or injured, the implications cannot be ignored. It’s a figure that warrants profound introspection and a critical assessment of the events that have transpired. It is a tragedy, no matter how you look at it.
The impact on the survivors is also a huge consideration. The long-term consequences of this conflict will be felt for generations. The physical and psychological scars will linger, and the rebuilding of lives and communities will be a monumental task. We must also acknowledge the environmental impact, the toxic legacy of the conflict. The exposure to asbestos and other dangerous substances poses an ongoing health hazard, further compounding the suffering.
The world’s response to this tragedy is also a crucial issue. The silence, the denial, and the attempts to downplay the severity of the situation are unacceptable. It’s time to demand accountability, transparency, and a commitment to justice. This isn’t just a regional conflict; it’s a global issue with implications for international law, human rights, and the future of peace. We need to be able to have a conversation about what happened, without being silenced.
It is easy to become disillusioned, to lose faith in the very idea of justice. But we cannot afford to succumb to despair. The acknowledgment of the scale of the casualties is a crucial step. It sets the stage for a reckoning, a moment to look the situation in the face and ask what happens next. It’s a call for those in positions of power to do the right thing and be an example. The fight for truth and justice, for the protection of human lives, is a responsibility we all share.