By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A Justice Department investigator, Glenn Prager, was recorded on camera claiming President Trump is shielding others implicated in the Jeffrey Epstein case. Prager stated that while he interviewed victims and reviewed Epstein’s itineraries, none implicated Trump in the crimes, but believes the president is protecting other individuals by being hesitant to release the files. Prager also stated that Bill Clinton was on Epstein’s plane when rapes occurred. The DOJ has since responded, dismissing Prager’s claims, citing his limited role in the department over 15 years ago.
Read the original article here
**Epstein Investigator Taped Admitting Trump ‘Covered Up’ Files**
The central issue here revolves around a Justice Department investigator’s alleged statements, captured on a hidden camera, suggesting that Donald Trump has been actively involved in covering up information contained within the Jeffrey Epstein case files. The tape, released by Project Veritas, immediately raises questions about the veracity of the claims, given the organization’s history of releasing deceptively edited videos. Skepticism is certainly warranted, and many are approaching this with caution, especially considering the source.
The key takeaway from the tape, as it’s being presented, is that Trump isn’t necessarily protecting himself directly, but rather shielding others implicated in the files. The immediate reaction to this is a combination of disbelief and frustration. The idea that Trump would act altruistically to protect others, particularly when it comes to something as sensitive as this, seems highly improbable. The common sentiment is that Trump’s actions are almost always driven by self-preservation and benefit, and this situation is unlikely to be an exception.
Many comments express that they’re unsurprised, and see this as another strategic move by Trump to deflect and minimize his involvement. The focus then shifts towards the core demand: the release of the Epstein files in their entirety, without redactions or modifications. The perceived delay in making these files public is fueling speculation and cynicism, leading many to believe that a cover-up is in progress, regardless of who is ultimately implicated. The sentiment is that this entire situation is being used to obfuscate the truth.
The implication of a “planned leak” is another recurring theme. Some theorize that the release of the edited tape serves a specific purpose, setting the stage for a selective release of the files. By creating a narrative of Trump protecting others, the plan is to shield him from direct scrutiny. The worry is that the released files will be altered.
Furthermore, the discussion highlights broader criticisms of the former president. The comments are scathing and focus on what’s perceived to be Trump’s character and patterns of behavior. The prevailing view is that he’s willing to throw anyone under the bus if it benefits him. Some suggest that the allegations, if true, are far more serious than just covering up. The focus is on what many already seem to believe, and the tape, regardless of its authenticity, confirms those suspicions for many.
The role of the media and the partisan divide is also subtly addressed. The comments anticipate predictable reactions from both sides of the political spectrum. There’s an expectation that supporters will staunchly defend Trump, regardless of any evidence. The conservative media’s shift in narrative is also noted, which has its own implications.
Ultimately, the core sentiment is one of profound distrust. Regardless of what this tape proves, the underlying issues remain. The demand for transparency, accountability, and the release of the Epstein files is overwhelming. This isn’t just about one individual. This is about a larger struggle for truth and justice in the face of significant power and influence.