By John Q. Hosedrinker 
Dominican Republic authorities recovered 377 packages of cocaine from a speedboat destroyed by the U.S. Navy, alleging it was carrying 1,000 kilograms of the drug and attempting to use the nation as a transit point. The joint operation, a first of its kind, involved collaboration between the Dominican Republic Navy and U.S. authorities in the southern Caribbean where the U.S. has deployed warships in an anti-narcotics mission. The Trump administration’s initiative has been met with controversy, as human rights groups condemn the strikes on the vessels as extrajudicial killings. The White House claims the boats originated from Venezuela, which denies the allegations and views the U.S. naval presence as an assault.
Read the original article here
Dominican Republic says it seized cocaine that was on speed boat destroyed by US Navy. That’s the core of the story, and frankly, it’s a wild one. We’ve got a situation where a U.S. Navy operation, part of a controversial anti-narcotics mission in the Caribbean, resulted in the destruction of a speedboat. Now, here’s the kicker: the Dominican Republic authorities are reporting they recovered a stash of cocaine linked to that very boat. It’s a complex scenario, and there are a lot of moving parts to unpack.
In the reports, the Dominican Republic’s National Directorate for Drug Control stated they pulled 377 packages of cocaine from the wreckage. This is supposedly out of a reported 1,000 kilograms the boat was allegedly carrying. The whole thing played out about 80 nautical miles off the coast of Isla Beata, a small island belonging to the Dominican Republic. It seems the Dominican Navy was working in concert with the U.S. authorities. The reported intent of the speedboat was to use the Dominican Republic as a “bridge” to get the cocaine into the United States.
The core issue at hand is how a boat gets obliterated by the U.S. Navy. This raises questions about the use of force. Sure, we’re talking about drug smugglers, and everyone wants to stop drugs, but is blowing up a boat the best way to do that? Couldn’t they have just apprehended them? This action could be seen as a case of extra-judicial killing, especially if there weren’t any attempts to arrest the people on board first.
The immediate challenge we need to address is that the drugs were not destroyed in this action, but the boat was. This raises logistical questions as to how those packages of cocaine, if there was any cocaine at all, stayed intact. And we are not talking about just a few meters, we are talking about 80 nautical miles in the open ocean. It’s hard to imagine the boat being obliterated by a missile, but then hundreds of kilos of cocaine somehow survive.
This operation touches upon deeper issues of strategy, with the “war on drugs.” We can see that those involved will just change their methods and tactics. Stopping the drug trade will mean changing the dynamics that make it profitable in the first place. It gets to the issue of the people involved. The more people in Latin America and the Caribbean who are involved in legal industries, the fewer people will be willing to risk their lives to be a part of the drug trade.
There are also serious questions about the use of military force and the potential for civilian casualties. The article highlights the fact that the US Navy is on a mission, but what if innocent people are involved? Where do we draw the line between stopping a crime and becoming the criminals?
There’s a strong current of skepticism surrounding the official narrative. The fact that the U.S. Navy was involved, along with Trump era politics, the presence of skepticism is understandable. Some commentators pointed out the idea that the Dominican Republic was going to receive money or face tariffs if they don’t go along with the official story.
The question of how they know the cocaine came from the destroyed boat is an important one. Without a definitive link, the claim becomes a little shakier.
Some might argue that this is a case of “finders keepers,” but again, a military attack is far from ideal. Many feel that this is just not the way we should be handling things. The end of the day there should be a trial and a judge to determine guilt or innocence.
It is also worth considering that the real issue may be much deeper than just this one incident. The story brings up the shadowy side of geopolitics, with speculation about secret operations and hidden agendas, is the current case another chapter of “Cia operation “Distraction away from”?” One can’t help but wonder about the larger picture.
At the same time, the incident also highlights the risks faced by those working in drug trafficking. The destruction of the boat suggests that the traffickers were involved in a high-stakes, dangerous enterprise.
The story has a lot of different threads, and it’s easy to get lost in them. It is a complicated situation, with lots of questions and few clear answers. There is plenty to discuss. Ultimately, the focus should be on ensuring justice, safety, and accountability.