By John Q. Hosedrinker 
A new bill, the Produce Epstein Treasury Records Act (PETRA), is demanding a congressional investigation into the financial ties between Peter Thiel and Jeffrey Epstein. Introduced by Sen. Ron Wyden, the bill aims to compel the Treasury Department to release documents related to Epstein’s finances, which included significant investments in a Thiel-backed firm. Wyden’s bill also seeks to uncover potential violations of anti-money laundering laws by J.P. Morgan and other banks. The bill is attached to the National Defense Authorization Act, ensuring all senators will have to publicly vote on whether to release information about Epstein’s associates.
Read the original article here
Dem Orders Congressional Probe Into Epstein and Peter Thiel’s Relationship
It appears that Democratic Senator Ron Wyden is taking a serious interest in the financial connections between Jeffrey Epstein and Peter Thiel. Wyden is demanding the Treasury Department release documents detailing Epstein’s finances, specifically focusing on investments made in Thiel-backed firms. This is a crucial step, especially considering that Epstein’s investments in Valar Ventures, a company supported by Thiel, have significantly increased in value, becoming the largest asset of the Epstein estate. The senator’s interest extends to understanding the movement of a staggering $1.5 billion involving Thiel, Epstein, and around 70 other individuals, suggesting a complex web of financial dealings that warrants closer scrutiny.
The investigation highlights how deeply intertwined the world of high finance and questionable figures can be. There’s a lot of discussion and concern around Thiel’s potential influence, and the Rogan interview with Thiel is mentioned to highlight the details of Thiel’s actions. The questions raised by this investigation are valid, and it’s essential to understand the extent of these connections and their potential implications. There’s a sentiment that this probe is a necessary step towards shedding light on the actions of powerful individuals.
The scrutiny of Thiel goes beyond just his association with Epstein. There are mentions of Thiel’s involvement in Palantir, a company known for its mass surveillance capabilities, particularly in its work with the Uyghurs. The article also highlights how Thiel used his resources to pursue legal action against Gawker, reportedly after the site revealed he was gay. This action underlines his history of trying to shape his public image and suppress information he didn’t want released.
Furthermore, the investigation brings attention to the relationship between Epstein and Thiel. Leaked emails indicate that Epstein sought to be at the center of private money and public surveillance. These emails reveal Epstein’s involvement with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak. This collaboration led to a meeting between Epstein, Barak, and Thiel in 2014.
The probe is now extended beyond Thiel to look into Trump’s relationships. There are references to Trump’s dealings with Paragon Solutions, an Israeli spyware company, which potentially mirrors Epstein’s interest in the surveillance industry. These actions, along with Thiel’s investment in Palantir, raise questions about the influence of these individuals and companies in the realm of surveillance and intelligence gathering.
There is a sense of anticipation, but also a cautious tone. Many people feel it is a significant development, but some express skepticism, given the power dynamics at play. It seems to be a necessary step to bring these issues to light and hold those involved accountable. There are also a lot of references to Thiel grooming political figures, like JD Vance, indicating a long-term strategy for wielding influence.
The discussion of Thiel is not without skepticism. Thiel’s role in shaping his public image and his financial dealings with figures like Epstein raise many questions. This situation underscores the significance of transparency and accountability. It’s clear that there are many layers to this investigation, and its outcome remains to be seen. The investigation highlights the level of influence that some people have.