By John Q. Hosedrinker 
As a government shutdown looms, Democrats are criticizing Speaker Mike Johnson for postponing House votes, allegedly to delay a vote on the release of the Epstein files. This postponement also delays the swearing-in of Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva, whose vote is crucial to force a vote on the Epstein files release. Democrats argue that Johnson should swear in Grijalva during a pro forma session and reverse the decision to cancel votes. Johnson’s office maintains that Grijalva’s swearing-in will occur when the House reconvenes.
Read the original article here
Democrats Accuse Mike Johnson Of Stalling Swearing-In Over Epstein Files?
The situation is crystal clear, isn’t it? It’s not so much an accusation as it is a pointed observation: Mike Johnson appears to be deliberately delaying the swearing-in of a representative. The rationale behind this delay, or rather the lack of a legitimate reason, strongly suggests ulterior motives. It’s becoming obvious that the aim is to stall until a potential government shutdown happens. Why? To protect those involved in the Epstein files, which is the sole purpose of the tactic. There’s no other credible explanation. This isn’t the first time Johnson has allegedly employed such strategies. His history, like that of the GOP, seems to indicate a pattern of protecting individuals linked to such controversies. This raises a critical question: why? It’s time to step back from the partisan divides and demand accountability. This behavior, to keep children vulnerable to sexual abuse, is simply unacceptable.
The behavior from Johnson is not a surprise, but simply “on brand”. It’s a strategy we’ve seen before, reminiscent of actions from the Nixon and Trump eras. It’s almost as if this is a calculated move, as the government shutdown is what they want before they can release any of the relevant files. Instead of euphemisms, the focus should be on the real issue: Mike Johnson and the potential protection of individuals tied to the Epstein case.
Johnson’s actions also bring up the question of his faith and how that may influence his political decisions. It is a question of whether faith dictates whether he blocks any release of the Epstein files. It’s about recognizing the influence of powerful figures and their willingness to prioritize their own interests, which, is more than likely in line with their own religious beliefs.
The focus, however, should remain on the core issue: the deliberate stalling of the swearing-in and the potential motivation behind it. This is not about a matter of opinion; it is about the facts. Johnson has been delaying the swearing-in without a clear legal basis for doing so. This tactic seems designed to protect specific individuals, including Donald Trump, and potentially some Republican donors. The question is not if he is stalling but why?
The GOP’s strategy is clear and concerning. The delaying tactics, particularly the refusal to release information, should, in any other context, be a career-ending move. However, in this political climate, it seems the GOP believes they have a free pass.
The media coverage of the situation has been careful in wording and has not expressed as much directness. The focus should be on the actions that Johnson is doing. It’s not an accusation when the facts are so evident.
The consequences are concerning, given the potential for those involved to be protected. The GOP should realize that their base will not care, and that may even be the goal.
The call to action is simple: demand accountability. Call his office and demand an explanation. It’s time to recognize that this is a deliberate obstruction of justice.